Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial
Abstract:Purpose
Aging affects pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of anesthetics, but age effects on Entropy-guided total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusions (TIVA-TCI) are not fully characterized. We compared aging effects on effective estimated brain concentration of Propofol (CeP) during TIVA-TCI Entropy-guided anesthesia, without neuromuscular blockade (NMB).
Methods
We performed an observational, prospective, single-center study enrolling 75 adult women undergoing Entropy-guided Propofol-Remif… Show more
“…Even if the impact of physiological changes on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetic drugs as well as on ABM observed with aging [ 76 , 77 , 78 ] was postulated to influence explicit and implicit memory formation [ 79 ], in our study, aging seems not to be a risk factor for implicit memory occurrence. The age-induced decline of implicit memory (e.g., priming) is less than the decline of explicit memory (e.g., recognition) [ 79 ].…”
General anesthesia should induce unconsciousness and provide amnesia. Amnesia refers to the absence of explicit and implicit memories. Unlike explicit memory, implicit memory is not consciously recalled, and it can affect behavior/performance at a later time. The impact of general anesthesia in preventing implicit memory formation is not well-established. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies reporting implicit memory occurrence in adult patients after deep sedation (Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation of 0–1 with spontaneous breathing) or general anesthesia. We also evaluated the impact of different anesthetic/analgesic regimens and the time point of auditory task delivery on implicit memory formation. The meta-analysis included the estimation of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included a total of 61 studies with 3906 patients and 119 different cohorts. For 43 cohorts (36.1%), implicit memory events were reported. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III–IV was associated with a higher likelihood of implicit memory formation (OR:3.48; 95%CI:1.18–10.25, p < 0.05) than ASA physical status I–II. Further, there was a lower likelihood of implicit memory formation for deep sedation cases, compared to general anesthesia (OR:0.10; 95%CI:0.01–0.76, p < 0.05) and for patients receiving premedication with benzodiazepines compared to not premedicated patients before general anesthesia (OR:0.35; 95%CI:0.13–0.93, p = 0.05).
“…Even if the impact of physiological changes on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetic drugs as well as on ABM observed with aging [ 76 , 77 , 78 ] was postulated to influence explicit and implicit memory formation [ 79 ], in our study, aging seems not to be a risk factor for implicit memory occurrence. The age-induced decline of implicit memory (e.g., priming) is less than the decline of explicit memory (e.g., recognition) [ 79 ].…”
General anesthesia should induce unconsciousness and provide amnesia. Amnesia refers to the absence of explicit and implicit memories. Unlike explicit memory, implicit memory is not consciously recalled, and it can affect behavior/performance at a later time. The impact of general anesthesia in preventing implicit memory formation is not well-established. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies reporting implicit memory occurrence in adult patients after deep sedation (Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation of 0–1 with spontaneous breathing) or general anesthesia. We also evaluated the impact of different anesthetic/analgesic regimens and the time point of auditory task delivery on implicit memory formation. The meta-analysis included the estimation of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included a total of 61 studies with 3906 patients and 119 different cohorts. For 43 cohorts (36.1%), implicit memory events were reported. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III–IV was associated with a higher likelihood of implicit memory formation (OR:3.48; 95%CI:1.18–10.25, p < 0.05) than ASA physical status I–II. Further, there was a lower likelihood of implicit memory formation for deep sedation cases, compared to general anesthesia (OR:0.10; 95%CI:0.01–0.76, p < 0.05) and for patients receiving premedication with benzodiazepines compared to not premedicated patients before general anesthesia (OR:0.35; 95%CI:0.13–0.93, p = 0.05).
“…The Eleveld TCI model also showed a higher bias in Predictive Median Performance Error (MdPE) than the Schnider one in older patients, probably contributing to higher DAEs and BSEs in older subjects [5]. Despite aging producing alterations in cardiovascular physiology that increase the onset time of anesthetic drugs [32], an increase in sensitivity to the hypnotic drug in the elderly compared to adults [11] may exacerbate the effect of equilibration between plasma and effect site concentration and favor deep anesthesia events during TIVA-TCI in elderly patients, in particular BSEs [33], which deserve attention due to being related to postoperative delirium and neurocognitive disorders [21,34]-although this is still debated [35][36][37]. Furthermore, aging was shown to impact the depth of anesthesia monitoring and EEG-based monitoring systems; different studies have shown higher indices in elders than in young people under a comparable anesthetic plan [33,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite aging producing alterations in cardiovascular physiology that increase the onset time of anesthetic drugs [32], an increase in sensitivity to the hypnotic drug in the elderly compared to adults [11] may exacerbate the effect of equilibration between plasma and effect site concentration and favor deep anesthesia events during TIVA-TCI in elderly patients, in particular BSEs [33], which deserve attention due to being related to postoperative delirium and neurocognitive disorders [21,34]-although this is still debated [35][36][37]. Furthermore, aging was shown to impact the depth of anesthesia monitoring and EEG-based monitoring systems; different studies have shown higher indices in elders than in young people under a comparable anesthetic plan [33,38]. Modulating the rate of propofol infusion after anesthesia induction on the basis of a difference between the expected and measured BIS, as in the Eleveld model which uses BIS as the measure of effect [2], may increase the risk of hypnotic overdosage and result in deep anesthesia events, particularly in elderly patients [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, aging was shown to impact the depth of anesthesia monitoring and EEG-based monitoring systems; different studies have shown higher indices in elders than in young people under a comparable anesthetic plan [33,38]. Modulating the rate of propofol infusion after anesthesia induction on the basis of a difference between the expected and measured BIS, as in the Eleveld model which uses BIS as the measure of effect [2], may increase the risk of hypnotic overdosage and result in deep anesthesia events, particularly in elderly patients [33].…”
Background: Various pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models have been developed to accurately dose propofol administration during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion (TIVA-TCI). We aim to clinically compare the performance of the Schnider model and the new and general-purpose Eleveld PK/PD model during TIVA-TCI. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at a single center, enrolling 78 female patients, including 37 adults (aged < 65 years) and 41 elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years). These patients underwent breast surgery with propofol-remifentanil TIVA-TCI guided by the bispectral index (BIS) for depth of anesthesia monitoring (target value 40–60) and the surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) for antinociception monitoring (target value 20–50) without neuromuscular blockade. The concentration at the effect site of propofol (CeP) at loss of responsiveness (LoR) during anesthesia maintenance (MA) and at return of responsiveness (RoR), the duration of surgery and anesthesia (min), the time to RoR (min), the propofol total dose (mg), the deepening of anesthesia events (DAEs), burst suppression events (BSEs), light anesthesia events (LAEs) and unwanted spontaneous responsiveness events (USREs) were considered to compare the two PK/PD models. Results: Patients undergoing BIS-SPI-guided TIVA-TCI with the Eleveld PK/PD model showed a lower CeP at LoR (1.7 (1.36–2.25) vs. 3.60 (3.00–4.18) μg/mL, p < 0.001), higher CePMA (2.80 (2.55–3.40) vs. 2.30 (1.80–2.50) μg/mL, p < 0.001) and at RoR (1.48 (1.08–1.80) vs. 0.64 (0.55–0.81) μg/mL, p < 0.001) than with the Schnider PK/PD model. Anesthetic hysteresis was observed only in the Schnider PK/PD model group (p < 0.001). DAEs (69.2% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.001) and BSEs (28.2% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.013) were more frequent with the Eleveld PK/PD model than with the Schnider PK/PD model in the general patient population. DAEs (63.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.030) and BSEs (31.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.036) were more frequent with the Eleveld PK/PD model than with the Schnider PK/PD model in the elderly. Conclusions: The Schnider and Eleveld PK/PD models impact CePs differently. A greater incidence of DAEs and BSEs in the elderly suggests more attention is necessary in this group of patients undergoing BIS-SPI-guided TIVA-TCI with the Eleveld PK/PD than with the Schnider model.
“… 7 The unreliability of commonly used sedation scales in conditions where the patient is nonresponsive due to muscle relaxation leads to various objective methods of assessment. The objective methods of assessing sedation in mechanically ventilated patients are Bispectral Index (BIS), 8 Entropy, 9 Narcotrend, 10 and others.…”
A
bstract
Background
The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU.
Materials and methods
Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2–5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5–2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and −3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score.
Results
A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288,
p
<0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021).
Conclusion
qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Clinical trial registration
CTRI/2019/07/020064.
How to cite this article
Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491–495.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.