1998
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199805001-01815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age, Gender and Performance on the U.S.ARMY Physical Fitness Test (Apft)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a sample of active duty soldiers in the 17-to 21-year-old age group had a mean 2-minute sit-up test score of 60 to 65 repetition (males [mean ± SD] = 65.0 ± 9.7 repetitions, females [mean ± SD] = 60.5 ± 10.9 repetitions). 19 These findings bear testimony to the high level of physical fitness of all of the participants entering the current study. This consistent display of a high level of pretraining abdominal muscular fitness across all groups led us to consider a 5-repetition improvement or greater in 6 weeks as clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Furthermore, a sample of active duty soldiers in the 17-to 21-year-old age group had a mean 2-minute sit-up test score of 60 to 65 repetition (males [mean ± SD] = 65.0 ± 9.7 repetitions, females [mean ± SD] = 60.5 ± 10.9 repetitions). 19 These findings bear testimony to the high level of physical fitness of all of the participants entering the current study. This consistent display of a high level of pretraining abdominal muscular fitness across all groups led us to consider a 5-repetition improvement or greater in 6 weeks as clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The Office of the Surgeon General non-concurred with the recommendation on the basis that: "morale impact on women, request for "criterion based" standards, increased risk for the 50+ year groups, psychological trauma on those who minimally pass, and a perception that the APFT will be used to downsize." 173 The proposed, more equitable (for some more rigorous) standards were never approved. In Chapter 5 he provided a detailed analysis of US Army fitness levels, in particular addressing the flight from combat-related PRT and assessment to a more "corporate fitness" model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%