1981
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(81)90173-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimations based on amino acid racemization: Reply to comments of J.F. Wehmiller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major conclusion of our report is that amino acid D/L data conform to local litho-or biostratigraphic control, but that there is a significant conflict between the absolute ages (and age differences) inferred from the amino acid data and some of the U-series dates. Furthermore, we conclude that these conflicts cannot be explained by either of the two kinetic models or racemization that have been proposed for these applications (Wehmiller, 1981;Kvenvolden et al, 1981). We suggest that some of the U-series dates might be misleading because of isotopic evidence of diagenetic contamination; alternatively, if the U-series dates are correct measures of the absolute ages of the shells analyzed here, then some basic assumptions inherent to the amino acid dating method must be questioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A major conclusion of our report is that amino acid D/L data conform to local litho-or biostratigraphic control, but that there is a significant conflict between the absolute ages (and age differences) inferred from the amino acid data and some of the U-series dates. Furthermore, we conclude that these conflicts cannot be explained by either of the two kinetic models or racemization that have been proposed for these applications (Wehmiller, 1981;Kvenvolden et al, 1981). We suggest that some of the U-series dates might be misleading because of isotopic evidence of diagenetic contamination; alternatively, if the U-series dates are correct measures of the absolute ages of the shells analyzed here, then some basic assumptions inherent to the amino acid dating method must be questioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…tive to the shape of the temperature history For leucine racemization, we have relied curve, because the duration of time spent at upon a number of field (Wehmiller, 1977, maximum and minimum temperatures is the 1981) and laboratory (Bada and Schroeder, most important factor kinetically. 1972; Mitterer, 1975;Smith et al, 1978; The approach outlined above is a relative Kvenvolden et al, 1981) studies that indi-one that normalizes EQT values (or effeccate an activation energy between 27 and 30 tive temperature reductions) to present day kcaYmole. A convenient expression for the mean-annual air temperatures, because rate constant (k) dependence on tempera-these are the records that are most freture (T, "K) for this approximate activation quently available.…”
Section: Temperature Histories Of Pleistocene Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These "amino-stratigraphic" correlations require some theoretical or empirical basis. The correlations shown in Figure 6 are based on: (1) the temperature dependence inherent to the kinetic model of leucine racemization as proposed by Wehmiller and Belknap (1982); (2) the observed similarity between the kinetics and the temperature dependence of leucine racemization in Mercenaria on the Atlantic coast, and in three closely related Pacific coast venerid bivalves (Wehmiller and Belknap, 1978;1982); and (3) the assumption that the gradient of Effective Quaternary Temperature (EQT; the gradient is graphically represented by the slope of the dashed line: Wehmiller and Emerson, 1980;Wehmiller et al, 1977;Wehmiller, 1981;Kvenvolden et al, 1981) between the Neuse River and Charleston has been similar to the present temperature gradient, which is about 2°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using nonlinear kinetic modeling, Wehmiller (1981) recalculated the ages of units I/II and IV at Willapa Bay to be 300 ± 50 ka and 70 ± 15 ka, respectively, suggesting correlation with MIS 9 and MIS 5a. Kvenvolden et al (1981) countered that nonlinear kinetics could be applied to amino acid values within the ranges of what their samples yielded, and also noted that Wehmiller's (1981) age estimates would require a much more complex geologic history than their age estimates. Kennedy et al (1982) reported new amino acid values in Saxidomus from unit IV and using a lateral correlation (aminozone) approach, considered that the unit IV deposits at Willapa Bay were of MIS 5a age, in agreement with Wehmiller (1981).…”
Section: Willapa Baymentioning
confidence: 99%