2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02064-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation in forensic anthropology: methodological considerations about the validation studies of prediction models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important to recognize the fact that it is not only about acquiring and storing data, but how these data are compiled in order to meet ethical requirements and avoid machine bias [222], among others. All this problematic, related to the absence of large and complete datasets, may also be at the root of the inadequacy found in how some methods calculate, express and interpret the obtained errors (for instance, in age estimation [223]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also important to recognize the fact that it is not only about acquiring and storing data, but how these data are compiled in order to meet ethical requirements and avoid machine bias [222], among others. All this problematic, related to the absence of large and complete datasets, may also be at the root of the inadequacy found in how some methods calculate, express and interpret the obtained errors (for instance, in age estimation [223]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual methodology in FA is generally limited in effectiveness. Many of these methods use very subjective criteria and, in many cases, have not been properly validated [223]. Some of the most commonly used BP methods were developed 50-100 years ago, as Todd's ten-phase method to analyze the pubic symphysis to estimate age [235], the Greulich and Pyle method based on the atlas [26] from the late fifties, and that of Tanner-Whitehouse [79], developed in 1975.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A este respecto, se ha planteado la necesidad de conocer los errores de los métodos como medida de la confiabilidad de los mismos, con el objeto de establecer criterios que permitan seleccionar el mejor método disponible de acuerdo al grupo de edad y preservación de los individuos a estudiar (Valsecchi et al 2019). Esto evitaría la utilización de métodos solo por ser lo más difundidos o más conocidos y aportaría a fundamentar la elección en criterios científicos sólidos Buckberry 2015).…”
Section: De La Validación Metodológicaunclassified
“…Esto evitaría la utilización de métodos solo por ser lo más difundidos o más conocidos y aportaría a fundamentar la elección en criterios científicos sólidos Buckberry 2015). En este sentido, la mejor herramienta para establecer estos criterios la representan las validaciones metodológicas que se centran en estudiar la efectividad y aplicabilidad de los métodos en distintas muestras (Corron et al 2018;Valsecchi et al 2019).…”
Section: De La Validación Metodológicaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation