2010
DOI: 10.1097/paf.0b013e3181c0e7a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age Estimation From the Rib by Components Method Analysis in White Males

Abstract: Changes at the sternal extremity of the fourth rib have already been established as reliable indicators of age at death. Still now, the Iscan "phase method," based on the morphologic changes at the sternal extremity of the fourth rib, is one of the best effective for age estimation at death. The present study was carried out to develop an alternative method considering the morphologic characteristics of articular surface (A), anterior/posterior walls (B), and superior/inferior edges (C) of the sternal extremit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No measure of significance for each regression and correlation are reported. These results support those found for males (Verzeletti et al 2010), suggesting that the articular surface is the most accurate predictor of age in this population. The efficacy of this study is compromised by the small sample, over representation of individuals over the age of 51 years, and the lack of quantification of inter-and intra-observer error.…”
Section: Verzeletti Terlisio and De Ferrari (2013)supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No measure of significance for each regression and correlation are reported. These results support those found for males (Verzeletti et al 2010), suggesting that the articular surface is the most accurate predictor of age in this population. The efficacy of this study is compromised by the small sample, over representation of individuals over the age of 51 years, and the lack of quantification of inter-and intra-observer error.…”
Section: Verzeletti Terlisio and De Ferrari (2013)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Traditional morphoscopic techniques do not readily lend themselves to rigorous statistical analysis from which quantifiable conclusions may be drawn, given that they generate qualitative rather than quantitative data (Hefner and Stephen 2012). The attribution of a numerical score, rather than a description of the appearance of a given skeletal feature, permits the development of a statistical model for the estimation of age (Verzeletti et al 2010). The use of geometric morphometric techniques as an alternative method for the quantification of shape variables has also provided a means of statistically evaluating morphological differences between individuals.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E5 had a coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.830 and exhibited average residual error of 4.70±0.33 (SD), with a maximum of 12.57 years in one case. To put this into the forensic context and practice we have collated information for other laboratory-based age estimation methods[6,7,13,4853] and age estimation methods based on the rib[4,5,8,11,5457] from the literature including the present one. Comparing R 2 , which is the proportion of the variance in age that is explained by the regression model in each case and the mean residual error, E1 ranks third (see Table 5), making this, to our knowledge, the most accurate laboratory-based age estimation methods for ribs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…_ Is ßcan provided a full description of the characteristics of each phase and confirmed the reproducibility of the results while other studies the accuracy of the method [3][4][5][6][7]. The aim of this study is to develop a model for determining the age from morphological analysis of the sternal end of the fourth rib, alternative to the _ Is ßcan's ''phases method'', regarding a sample of Caucasian females, considering that Caucasian males were already investigated in our institution in a similar way [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%