“…As can happen in mass disasters or in some forensic or archaeological cases, e.g., the recovery of isolated skulls or jaws, charred corpses, and young pre-puberal skeletons, the recovered human remains can offer insufficient evidence for a conclusive sex identification based on common skeletal and genetic analysis. Dental size and traits have been shown to have significative variations between male and female subjects [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] and odontometric methods in particular have been experimented with in different populations for sex diagnosis. However, odontometrics requires the analysis of numerous dental elements to obtain high levels of reliability ( Table 3 ), thereby the method applicability depends on the kind and the number of retrieved teeth from the human remains.…”