2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation from clavicular epiphyseal union sequencing in a Northwest Indian population of the Chandigarh region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results revealed no significant differences between males and females (except for stage 1) (Table III) or right and left sides as regard age of ossification of medial end clavicles as mentioned before. This was in concurrence with studies of Kellinghaus et al (2010a) (except for stage 2); Kellinghaus et al (2010b); Schulze et al (2006);and Wittschieber et al (2014) (except for stages 2b; 3; 3c and 4) in Germany; Bassed et al (2011) in Australia;El Gerby et al (2013) in Egypt (except for stages 1, 3 and 5); Pattamapaspong et al (2015) in Thailand (except in stage 2); Singh & Chavali (2011) and Gakhar et al (2014) in India; Brown et al (2013) in Ghana (except in stages 2, 3 and 4) and Garamendi et al (2011) in Spain. They regarded no significant distinction of right and left sides or both sexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results revealed no significant differences between males and females (except for stage 1) (Table III) or right and left sides as regard age of ossification of medial end clavicles as mentioned before. This was in concurrence with studies of Kellinghaus et al (2010a) (except for stage 2); Kellinghaus et al (2010b); Schulze et al (2006);and Wittschieber et al (2014) (except for stages 2b; 3; 3c and 4) in Germany; Bassed et al (2011) in Australia;El Gerby et al (2013) in Egypt (except for stages 1, 3 and 5); Pattamapaspong et al (2015) in Thailand (except in stage 2); Singh & Chavali (2011) and Gakhar et al (2014) in India; Brown et al (2013) in Ghana (except in stages 2, 3 and 4) and Garamendi et al (2011) in Spain. They regarded no significant distinction of right and left sides or both sexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, as third molars are sometimes missing, for reasons of agenesis or extraction, estimating the age of majority based on these teeth is impossible [52]. Previous studies also examined the medial extremity of the clavicle, which has been exhaustively studied by plain X-rays, multi-slice computed tomography and ultrasound [53][54][55][56][57][58], and the wrist, which has also been closely studied with the Greulich and Pyle radiographic atlas [60]. For this reason, and in order to offer a valuable alternative method for assessing 18 years of age, a different anatomical region was analysed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have been conducted on the time frame for the ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in the age group concerned for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals. One group of studies adopted an anatomical perspective, assessing ossification by means of autopsy or direct skeletal inspection (Todd & D'Errico, 1928;McKern & Stewart, 1957;Owings Webb & Myers Suchey, 1985;MacLaughlin, 1990;Ji et al, 1994;Black & Scheuer, 1996;Shirley, 2009;Singh & Chavali, 2011), while the other group took a radiological approach. Several authors pointed out, that data from dry bone material are not directly comparable with data from radiological studies.…”
Section: Age Estimation In the Claviclementioning
confidence: 99%