2011 3rd Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ceec.2011.5995826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation based on speech features and support vector machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this decade, many different techniques, mostly inspired from the automatic speaker and language recognition fields, have been suggested for categorizing speakers based on their age groups. For example, using different types of acoustic features and Support Vector Machines (SVM) (Mahmoodi et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2011;van Heerden et al, 2010), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) mean supervectors and SVM (Bocklet et al, 2008a), nuisance attribute projection (Dobry et al, 2009), anchor models (Dobry et al, 2009) and parallel phoneme recognizers (Metze et al, 2007). The age sub-challenge of the Interspeech 2010 paralinguistic challenge provided a forum for presenting stateof-the-art methods in speaker age group classification (Schuller et al, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this decade, many different techniques, mostly inspired from the automatic speaker and language recognition fields, have been suggested for categorizing speakers based on their age groups. For example, using different types of acoustic features and Support Vector Machines (SVM) (Mahmoodi et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2011;van Heerden et al, 2010), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) mean supervectors and SVM (Bocklet et al, 2008a), nuisance attribute projection (Dobry et al, 2009), anchor models (Dobry et al, 2009) and parallel phoneme recognizers (Metze et al, 2007). The age sub-challenge of the Interspeech 2010 paralinguistic challenge provided a forum for presenting stateof-the-art methods in speaker age group classification (Schuller et al, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches to speaker's age estimation were proposed in the literature. Most of them are based on mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) as the voice signal features [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In study [11], formants and harmonics were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In study [11], formants and harmonics were used. For age classification, the most popular approaches employ support vector machine and its modifications [4,5,7,9,10,[12][13][14]. The Gaussian mixture models [5,6,8,9,[12][13][14][15] and hidden Markov models were also often used for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on different acoustical features and classifiers, a large number of methods for evaluation of speaker's age have been proposed in literature [ 2 , 9 , 10 ]. Common features of such systems include using hidden Markov models (HMM) [ 11 ], support vector machines [ 12 14 ], and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) [ 2 ] and improvement of the age classes based on data projection to lower spaces [ 1 , 15 ]. Iseli et al [ 1 ] modeled speakers by HMM weight supervector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using SVM to classify the features, they reported up to 10% improvement of the accuracy via the proposed dimension reduction. Mahmoodi et al [ 12 ] used an SVM with RBF kernel, which received Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) and PLP coefficients as features. They repeated the experiments for different numbers of MFCCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%