2000
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.14.3.409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age effects on executive ability.

Abstract: Heterogeneity of executive tasks has made it difficult to determine whether there are age-related declines in executive functioning. To address this issue, 112 individuals, 20-79 years old, took the California Trail Making Test (CTMT) and the California Stroop Test (CST), subtests of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale (D. C. Delis, E. Kaplan, & J. H. Kramer, in press) that include measurement of component skills embedded in the executive function tasks. Multiple regression analyses revealed that after c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
2
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
89
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, age differences in WM could be explained by age-related differences in processing speed and interference control. This study adds to the growing body of literature that argues for the importance of both speed and interference control as separable factors that may contribute to age-related differences in cognitive performance (Braver et al, 2001;Kramer, Hahn, & Gopher, 1999;Kray & Lindenberger, 2000;Kwong See & Ryan, 1995;Meiran, Gotler, & Perlman, 2001;Persad, Abeles, Zacks, & Denburg, 2002;Spieler, Balota, & Faust, 1996;Van der Linden et al, 1999;Verhaeghen & De Meersman, 1998;Wecker, Kramer, Wisniewski, Delis, & Kaplan, 2000;West & Baylis, 1998). Especially important is the question of the life span development of processing speed and control of interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In turn, age differences in WM could be explained by age-related differences in processing speed and interference control. This study adds to the growing body of literature that argues for the importance of both speed and interference control as separable factors that may contribute to age-related differences in cognitive performance (Braver et al, 2001;Kramer, Hahn, & Gopher, 1999;Kray & Lindenberger, 2000;Kwong See & Ryan, 1995;Meiran, Gotler, & Perlman, 2001;Persad, Abeles, Zacks, & Denburg, 2002;Spieler, Balota, & Faust, 1996;Van der Linden et al, 1999;Verhaeghen & De Meersman, 1998;Wecker, Kramer, Wisniewski, Delis, & Kaplan, 2000;West & Baylis, 1998). Especially important is the question of the life span development of processing speed and control of interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the total length of myelinated axons is reduced by as much as 47% in old age, with the greatest loss evident in small-diameter fibers, which myelinate later in life in frontal regions of the brain (Pakkenberg, 1989). Such changes may well be related to the decline in circumscribed executive cognitive functions seen in aging (Brennan, Welsh, & Fisher, 1997;Wecker, Kramer, Wisniewski, Delis, & Kaplan, 2000).…”
Section: Potential Utility Of Our Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, older adults exhibit deficits in performance (i.e., reaction time [RT], response accuracy) across a variety of tasks involving attention, cognition, and memory [40,46,47,49,51,58,60]. These age-related decrements in performance are disproportionately larger for tasks or task components that involve greater amounts of executive control [18,33,34] and are markedly reduced on tasks or task components that place smaller demands on the executive system [59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%