2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age differences in the functional interactions among the default, frontoparietal control, and dorsal attention networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

56
269
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
56
269
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns of network differentiation with age have been reported in a more circumscribed set of brain networks, including the default, dorsal attention and frontal parietal control networks both during task and at rest [122,123]. Specific changes include reduced anticorrelations between dorsal attention and default networks and increased network interactions across all three networks, consistent with a network dedifferentiation account.…”
Section: Changes In Functional Brain Networksupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar patterns of network differentiation with age have been reported in a more circumscribed set of brain networks, including the default, dorsal attention and frontal parietal control networks both during task and at rest [122,123]. Specific changes include reduced anticorrelations between dorsal attention and default networks and increased network interactions across all three networks, consistent with a network dedifferentiation account.…”
Section: Changes In Functional Brain Networksupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Age-related changes include reduced suppression [112,116,117] and decreased within-network connectivity during both task [110,113,118] and rest [108,109,119,120]. Recent evidence also suggests that the default network is more functionally connected to other brain networks in aging [113,114,[119][120][121][122] and this connectivity is poorly modulated by task context [96,97,[122][123][124].…”
Section: Changes In Functional Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, reductions in task-related default network suppression and altered FC have been observed with advancing age (Andrews-Hanna et al, 2007; Damoiseaux et al, 2008; Grady et al, 2010; Hafkemeijer, van der Grond, & Rombouts, 2012; Sala-Llonch et al, 2012; Sambataro et al, 2010; Stevens, Hasher, Chiew, & Grady, 2008; Turner & Spreng, 2015). These findings complement whole brain resting-state FC (RSFC) observations of a dedifferentiation of network connectivity with age, with increases in RSFC between large-scale brain systems in older adults (Betzel et al, 2014; Chan, Park, Savalia, Petersen, & Wig, 2014; Geerligs, Renken, Saliasi, Maurits, & Lorist, 2015; Grady, Sarraf, Saverino, & Campbell, 2016; Meunier, Achard, Morcom, & Bullmore, 2009; Onoda & Yamaguchi, 2013). It is unclear, however, if the robust pattern of anticorrelated activity between the default and dorsal attention networks is preserved into older adulthood.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Chan et al (2014) observed increased correlations between default and dorsal attention networks as one feature of a larger pattern of reduced network segregation in older adulthood (see also, Grady et al, 2016). However age-related changes in anticorrelation between networks were not investigated in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The unique feature of graph-theoretical analysis, compared with the more traditional univariate neuroimaging approaches, is that it can directly test the differences in topological parameters of the brain network such as small-worldness, modularity, highly connected regions (hubs), and regional network parameters. [32]. Hosseini et al has developed a GAT: Graph Analysis Toolbox available at: https://www.nitrc.org/projects/gat/.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%