2015
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1060944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age differences in rumination and autobiographical retrieval

Abstract: These results suggest that a different interaction between brooding rumination and the valence of autobiographical memories may be a relevant variable associated with mood differences by age.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were given 60 s to recall a specific memory for each cue (Debeer, Hermans, & Raes, ). Verbal responses were transcribed, and memories were scored as specific (unique events that took place within a single day and were more than 7 days old) or non‐specific and whether they were positive or negative in valence (Brittlebank, Scott, Williams, & Ferrier, ; Ricarte, Ros, Serrano, Martínez‐Lorca, & Latorre, ; Ricarte et al ., ). Specificity was operationalized as the proportion of specific memories recalled across all cues, and for memories of each valence for each cue type, relative to the total number of responses given.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were given 60 s to recall a specific memory for each cue (Debeer, Hermans, & Raes, ). Verbal responses were transcribed, and memories were scored as specific (unique events that took place within a single day and were more than 7 days old) or non‐specific and whether they were positive or negative in valence (Brittlebank, Scott, Williams, & Ferrier, ; Ricarte, Ros, Serrano, Martínez‐Lorca, & Latorre, ; Ricarte et al ., ). Specificity was operationalized as the proportion of specific memories recalled across all cues, and for memories of each valence for each cue type, relative to the total number of responses given.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbal responses were transcribed, and memories were coded for whether they were specific (e.g., referring to a unique event lasting less than 24 hours) or non-specific (e.g., referring to an event that happened multiple times or over a prolonged period of time, or if they answered with a concept semantically related to the cue) or whether they neglected to respond at all (referred to as an omission ). Each memory was additionally coded for whether they were positive in valence or negative or neutral 16,3335 . In accordance with psychometric analyses of the AMT 3638 , we quantified participants’ responses in terms of the proportion of specific responses that were given relative to the total number of cues minus the number of omissions each participant gave.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brooding is more akin to the analytical processing mode (why I feel that way), whereas reflection contains more of an evaluative component (how can I solve it). High reliability values have been obtained in Spanish samples (e.g., Ricarte, Ros, Serrano, Martínez‐Lorca & Latorre, ). In the current sample brooding and reflection subscales each showed a Cronbach alpha value of 0.71.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%