1990
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/45.2.p75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age Differences in Decision Making: A Process Methodology for Examining Strategic Information Processing

Abstract: This study explored the use of process tracing techniques in examining the decision-making processes of older and younger adults. Thirty-six college-age and thirty-six retirement-age participants decided which one of six cars they would purchase on the basis of computer-accessed data. They provided information search protocols. Results indicate that total time to reach a decision did not differ according to age. However, retirement-age participants used less information, spent more time viewing, and re-viewed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
229
5
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
229
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Johnson (1990) demonstrated that older adults use heuristic-type decision strategies (i.e., so-called noncompensatory decision strategies) to arrive at the same decision as do young adults who used more analytic strategies. As well, there is some evidence that the engagement of analytic processes may actually impair performance on attraction-type tasks (e.g., Simonson, 1989;Wedell & Pettibone, 1996) at least to judge by the increase in the size of the attraction effect seen when participants were asked to provide a justification for their decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Johnson (1990) demonstrated that older adults use heuristic-type decision strategies (i.e., so-called noncompensatory decision strategies) to arrive at the same decision as do young adults who used more analytic strategies. As well, there is some evidence that the engagement of analytic processes may actually impair performance on attraction-type tasks (e.g., Simonson, 1989;Wedell & Pettibone, 1996) at least to judge by the increase in the size of the attraction effect seen when participants were asked to provide a justification for their decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Do older and younger adults also differ in decision strategy selections and are they equally able to adjust their decision strategies to changing environmental structures? Johnson (1990Johnson ( , 1993 has provided evidence that when asked to select an apartment or a car older adults examined less information, reevaluated information more frequently, reviewed the information for longer time periods, and used more simplified search strategies. Others (Mata, von Helversen, & Rieskamp, 2010;Mata, Schooler, & Rieskamp, 2007) have investigated the effect of aging on the ability to select adaptive decision strategies in relation to different environmental structures.…”
Section: Age Decision Making and Strategy Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, older adults deliberate less when solving problems and have lower working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and speed of information processing (Johnson, 1990;Kim et al, 2002;MacPherson et al, 2002;Salthouse, 1996;Schaie & Willis, 1999). Lower working memory capacity or reduced deliberation / reflection time when making decisions are associated with impulsive decisions (Finn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%