2003
DOI: 10.1139/z03-173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age determination in yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus): a comparison of eye lens masses and bone sections

Abstract: Virtually all biological characteristics of organisms change with age, and thus, to assess the impact of these changes, accurate aging techniques are essential. However, many current methods are unable to accurately distinguish among adults of different ages. We determined the age of yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus) from the Rocky Mountains of Alberta using eye lens masses, annuli from mandible sections, and annuli from femurs. Each of these methods was assessed against nine known-age animals and seven a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured lens weight and total bone lines for each individual animal (Figure 2) as suggested by Barker et al (2003) and Epp et al (2009). The data were recalculated as a percentage of the mean of the respective measurements within species and summarized in an averaged numerical rank.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We measured lens weight and total bone lines for each individual animal (Figure 2) as suggested by Barker et al (2003) and Epp et al (2009). The data were recalculated as a percentage of the mean of the respective measurements within species and summarized in an averaged numerical rank.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eye lenses were dried for 5 days at 80°C and weighted (Barker et al, 2003). Femurs were washed and immersed in a rapid decalcifying solution (Baker, Histo Grade) for 24 h. Using a digital calliper, a 3 mm segment was taken from the mid-diaphysis of the femur and infiltrated with HEM as described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epp et al (2009) have used eye lens weights, assessed in both wild rats and laboratory conspecifics of known age, for age estimation. Barker et al (2003) and Cavegn et al (2013) combined lens weight with age-dependent structural changes in the number of adhesion lines in the circumferential lamellae of the femur. Even if it may not be possible to arrive at an exact absolute age that would allow direct comparison with laboratory-raised animals, it is at least possible to age wild animals relative to each other in a rather precise manner.…”
Section: Comparing the Age-dependent Regulation Of Hippocampal Neurogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative age was determined using the number of adhesion lines in the inner and outer circumferential lamellae of the femur (Barker et al, 2003). Femurs were washed and immersed in a solution for rapid decalcification (Baker, Histograde) for 24h.…”
Section: Relative Age Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%