Age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy: a radiological study

Bockmann, Benjamin; Soschynski, Sonja; Lechler, Philipp; Ruchholtz, Steffen; Debus, Florian; Schwarting, Tim; Frink, Michael

doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2863-y

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…e average age of the participants in our study was 40, and we detected a direct correlation between age and the glenoid size. In the literature, as pointed out by Matsuki et al and Bockmann et al, we excluded the osteopathic cases from our study to avoid the inclusion of cases with arthrosis [21,23]. Still, the correlation detected may be due to overlooked small osteophytes or the subchondral changes in the early period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population

Sari

Dinçel

Günaydın

et al. 2020

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is properly cited.Purpose. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. Methods. In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean age: 39.6 years) who had no shoulder complaints were evaluated retrospectively. Glenoid version (GV), AP diameter (width), and SI diameter (height) on both shoulders were measured on the CT images. Correlations between patient gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance and the GV and size were evaluated. Results. e right shoulder had a mean GV of − 0.93 ± 7.80 degrees and the left shoulder had a GV of − 0.88 ± 6.63 degrees (p > 0.05). e mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). e mean SI diameter of the glenoid was 31.8 ± 3.6 mm in the right and 31.7 ± 3.3 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). When men and women were evaluated in two separate groups, the GV, AP, and SI values did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the two shoulders in both genders (p > 0.05). ere was a positive correlation between the ages and heights of the patients and the glenoid size (p < 0.05). e mean AP diameter was approximately 28 mm and the SI diameter was 34 mm in males, whereas the mean AP diameter was 24 mm and the SI diameter was 30 mm in females (p < 0.05). e GV values of the dominant shoulders were significantly more retroverted (p < 0.05). ere was a positive correlation between the ages and heights of the patients and the glenoid size (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Hand dominance had an effect on the glenoid version, while patient gender, age, and height had an effect on the glenoid size. e glenoid width in the Turkish population was similar to that of the European and American populations, and the glenoid height was similar to that of the Asian population. Our GV values were similar to those of the Asian population and more anteverted compared to the Western population. We believe that our findings will be useful in preoperative planning and in the production of implants for our population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population

Sari

Dinçel

Günaydın

et al. 2020

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, we did not consider age, dominance, weight, height or nutritional status. The age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy in the non-degenerated shoulder is largely unknown (Bockmann et al, 2016). In our sample the oldest patient is 53 years old, so this factor is probably not related to the results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Glenoid size and Orientation in the Chilean Population

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Glenoid morphology is a key factor in determining the success of shoulder surgery. The purpose of this experimental study was to precisely determine the anatomical size and orientation of the glenoid in the Chilean population. 122 CT scans from asymptomatic Chilean patients were obtained. The mean age was 43.8 years (SD 12.3; range, 17-53 years) with 63 female and 59 male patients. For each of the scapulae, were obtained the glenoid version and inclination, maximum glenoid width and height, superior glenoid width, glenoid surface area, glenoid vault depth, and maximum scapular width. The glenoid size showed an average width of 26 ± 2.7 mm, a height of 40.3 ± 3.5 mm and a vault depth of 26.5 ± 3.7 mm. There were significant differences between men and women. The glenoid orientation showed an average of -13.9 ± 4.8° of retroversion and a superior inclination of 11.1 ± 4.7°. Significant differences between men and women were seen only for version. We conclude, that in this Chilean sample the morphological parameters of the glenoid correspond to the published literature, however, some characteristics in this cohort must be further confirmed using other methods.

show abstract

“…Knowles et al (2016) determined the width of the humeral head to be 47.1 mm in their study which included 50 individuals in Canada. In contrast, Bockmann et al (2016) determined the width of humeral head to be 43 mm in their study of 210 patients in Germany. Harrold & Wigderowitz (2013) determined the width of humeral head to be 48.8 mm in their study of 24 bone samples (14 female and 10 male) in Scotland.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…This is increasingly true as the complexity of surgical procedures and applications, such as arthroscopy and arthroplasty, has increased. Physicians must be familiar with the anatomy of the region (Bockmann et al, 2016). In addition, knowing the morphometric differences which depend on age, sex and ethnicity is necessary for the nearest anatomical match for implant applications in order to most closely match the pre-injury joint (Cabezas et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphological Determination of Glenohumeral Joint and Acromioclavicular Joint with Computed Tomography

Örs¹,

Bamaç²,

Çolak³

et al. 2022

Int. J. Morphol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although acute and chronic pathologies of the glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joints are frequently encountered in the population, the anatomy and morphometry are not fully known. The aim of this study is to determine the measurements of morphometric parameters according to age groups and sex in a large series of Turkish population. Nine hundred and forty-one shoulders computed tomography (CT) images were screened and those of subjects with healthy anatomical structure were included. Humeral head diameter (HDD) was measured on CT images. Measurements were made using 3D-CT images of: width (GW) and height (GH) of the glenoid cavity; width (CW) and height (CH) of the distal clavicular joint surface; and width (AW) and height (AH) of the acromial joint surface. Data were compared, stratified by age and sex. Images of 223 patients (118 men, 105 women) were analyzed. The following mean measurements were determined:

show abstract

Age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy: a radiological study

Cited by 8 publications

References 26 publications

Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population

Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population

Glenoid size and Orientation in the Chilean Population

Morphological Determination of Glenohumeral Joint and Acromioclavicular Joint with Computed Tomography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About