2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-dependent response to fasting during assessment of metabolizable energy and total tract digestibility in chicken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data were expressed on DM basis. The AME and AMEn of the experimental diets were calculated by the following formulas ( Wang et al, 2022 ): in which FI is the feed intake (kg DM); GE d is the GE content of diet (kcal/kg DM); EO is the output of excreta (kg DM); GE e is the GE content of excreta (kcal/kg DM); RN (retained nitrogen, g) = diet intake (g) × nitrogen content of diet – excreta output (g) × nitrogen content of excreta; and 8.22 kcal/g is the GE of uric acid per gram of nitrogen ( Hill and Anderson, 1958 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were expressed on DM basis. The AME and AMEn of the experimental diets were calculated by the following formulas ( Wang et al, 2022 ): in which FI is the feed intake (kg DM); GE d is the GE content of diet (kcal/kg DM); EO is the output of excreta (kg DM); GE e is the GE content of excreta (kcal/kg DM); RN (retained nitrogen, g) = diet intake (g) × nitrogen content of diet – excreta output (g) × nitrogen content of excreta; and 8.22 kcal/g is the GE of uric acid per gram of nitrogen ( Hill and Anderson, 1958 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be speculated that EGC breeders had less fasting time during the day, compared to SGC breeders. Fasting can improve digestibility of metabolizable energy in the diet with 1.8% compared to non-fasting (Wang et al, 2022). Assuming a 1.8% higher AME n availability for SGC breeders (on average 7.7 kcal/d), would result in a 0.02 lower predicted k e value on average for SGC breeders, which is then comparable to predicted k e values for EGC breeders.…”
Section: Dynamics In Energetic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 80%