2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1856-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Dependent Impairment of Spine Morphology and Synaptic Plasticity in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons of a Presenilin 1 Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract: Presenilin 1 (PS1) mutations are responsible for a majority of early onset familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) cases, in part by increasing the production of A␤ peptides. However, emerging evidence suggests other possible effects of PS1 on synaptic dysfunction where PS1 might contribute to the pathology independent of A␤. We chose to study the L286V mutation, an aggressive FAD mutation which has never been analyzed at the electrophysiological and morphological levels. In addition, we analyzed for the first time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some evidence demonstrating spine morphological plasticity with learning [20][21][22][23][24][25], as well as evidence that the converse hypothesis may be true; that is, failure of spine formation and morphological plasticity may contribute to impairments in cognition [26]. Additional support for the latter hypothesis comes from studies that report alterations of spine numbers and morphology in animal models of aging [27][28][29][30][31][32] or neurodegenerative disease [33][34][35][36][37][38][39], both of which are characterized by compromised cognitive function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence demonstrating spine morphological plasticity with learning [20][21][22][23][24][25], as well as evidence that the converse hypothesis may be true; that is, failure of spine formation and morphological plasticity may contribute to impairments in cognition [26]. Additional support for the latter hypothesis comes from studies that report alterations of spine numbers and morphology in animal models of aging [27][28][29][30][31][32] or neurodegenerative disease [33][34][35][36][37][38][39], both of which are characterized by compromised cognitive function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spines were classified as mushroom, stubby, thin or other by a blinded experimenter. Spines were defined as follows: mushroom, where the head width was >0.5 μm and at least twice the neck width; stubby, where there was no neck and the spine length and head width were approximately the same; thin, where the head width was <0.5 μm, with the spine length greater than the width; and other was any spine that did not clearly fit any of these categories owing to its odd shape (Sorra and Harris, 2000;Vanderklish and Edelman, 2002;Auffret et al, 2009;Dumitriu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cell Counts Dendritic Analysis and Spine Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with AD or MCI have fewer NMDARs in the frontal cortex and hippocampus [156,157]. In the genetic mouse model of AD, expression of surface NMDARs in neurons is decreased [158] and NMDAR-mediated response is impaired progressively with age [159,160]. In addition to reduced number of NMDARs, disrupted glutamatergic neurotransmission [146], decreased CSF concentrations of excitatory amino acids [161], decreased serum levels of DSR [162], and reduced D-aspartate uptake [163] are also noted in AD.…”
Section: Cognitive Impairment and Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%