2018
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.30.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-dependent changes in dynamic standing-balance ability evaluated quantitatively using a stabilometer

Abstract: [Purpose] The efficacy of a stabilometer-based index of postural stability (IPS) as an indicator of dynamic balance ability was investigated. [Subjects and Methods] Using a stabilometer, we calculated the IPS in 583 healthy subjects (178 males, 405 females) under two conditions (open eyes/hard surface, OE/HS; closed eyes/soft surface, CE/SS). [Results] Results revealed a negative relation between IPS and age. IPS (OE/HS) began to decrease at middle-age (40–60 years old), and then decreased more rapidly during … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to have (i) estimated the prevalence of a large number of frailty parameters among middle-aged community-dwellers (aged 50–65) and (ii) evidenced associations with adverse events. Most previous studies focused on older (over-65) participants or considered a small number of criteria (either the five CHS criteria or a few specific parameters), and none investigated the parameters’ prognostic value in multivariate models 8 , 9 , 13 21 . Although the frailty parameters were associated with adverse health events, the parameters’ clinical significance among younger adults may differ from that among older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to have (i) estimated the prevalence of a large number of frailty parameters among middle-aged community-dwellers (aged 50–65) and (ii) evidenced associations with adverse events. Most previous studies focused on older (over-65) participants or considered a small number of criteria (either the five CHS criteria or a few specific parameters), and none investigated the parameters’ prognostic value in multivariate models 8 , 9 , 13 21 . Although the frailty parameters were associated with adverse health events, the parameters’ clinical significance among younger adults may differ from that among older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the early detection of frailty is potentially important (since the condition might be reversible in its early stages) 11 , 12 , the prevalence of various components of frailty assessments (hereafter referred to as “frailty parameters”) among middle-aged populations and the parameters’ relationships with further adverse events have not been extensively documented in the literature. Most of the literature studies have focused on older adults or on a small number of frailty parameters, and none investigated the parameters’ prognostic value in multivariate models 1 , 8 , 9 , 13 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, the IPS was the best balancing test in comparison with other balancing tests in terms of showing the broadest association with the cognitive domains measured (data not shown). The IPS is characterized by high correlation with the Berg balance scale, high reproducibility, and not having a ceiling effect [ 33 ]. In addition, the degree of difficulty in the IPS may have been suitable compared with other balance tests in middle-aged individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TUG was performed as follows: the participant stood up from a chair without elbow rests and walked 3 meters forward and back as quickly as possible [ 32 ]. IPS was measured using a stabilometer (GP-6000, Anima, Tokyo, Japan) as described elsewhere [ 33 ]. First, participants stood in a resting position with the inside of the foot at a distance of 10 cm on the stabilometer to measure instantaneous fluctuations in the center of pressure (COP) at a sampling frequency of 20 Hz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Index of postural stability (IPS) was evaluated while barefoot and while wearing shoes with insoles. The IPS measurement was carried out according to the previous study 5,6) . From the measurements, IPS was calculated as "log[(area of stability limit + area of postural sway)/area of postural sway]."…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%