1996
DOI: 10.1037/h0094443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age changes in dream recall in adulthood.

Abstract: Dream recall was measured retrospectively with the Night Dreaming Scale of the Imaginal Processes Inventory. Evidence supports a high degree of correspondence among methods which assess dreaming frequency. A cross-sectional sample (17-92 years old, n = 2328) found fewer dreams recalled with increasing age. Women recalled more dreams and showed a less rapid decrease in frequency than men. Longitudinal changes (n = 333) over 6 to 8 years were not wholly consistent with cross-sectional age differences. We found m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

14
46
3
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
14
46
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings partly confirm previous results of Giambra et al (1996) who reported a decrease over a 6-year period for women but not for men. In the present data, there was neither an effect of age nor of gender on the decrease in dream recall frequency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present findings partly confirm previous results of Giambra et al (1996) who reported a decrease over a 6-year period for women but not for men. In the present data, there was neither an effect of age nor of gender on the decrease in dream recall frequency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Even though there is an overall decrease in the total sample, it should kept in mind that for about 75% of the participants dream recall frequency remained quite stable; a finding which supports the retrospective study of Schredl et al (1996). The retest correlation was quite high (r ϭ .663), comparable with the values reported by Giambra et al (1996) who found a correlation of r ϭ .69 for women and r ϭ .75 for men. The question of interest is, of course, the reason(s) for the intraindividual decreases in dream recall frequency, at least in some adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They are especially consistent with the finding that this DRF decrease occurs in early-to-middle adulthood rather than in later years (e.g., Herman and Shows, 1983; Giambra et al, 1996). We also demonstrate that this DRF decrease is preceded by a significant increase during adolescence, i.e., during the transition from ages 10–19 to 20–29.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A bulk of empirical evidence had made it clear that both the mechanisms underlying the encoding of episodic memory in sleep and wakefulness (De Gennaro et al 2011;Domhoff 2003;Marzano et al 2011a;Scarpelli et al 2015a;Schredl & Hoffmann 2003) and a specific electrophysiological background during sleep could affect the retrieval of the sleep mentation (De Gennaro et al 2010;Schredl 2009). On the one hand, frontal theta oscillations during REM sleep (Marzano et al 2011a;Scarpelli et al 2015a) and lower alpha power during NREM sleep (Esposito et al 2004;Marzano et al 2011a) predict the subsequent DR, and these patterns resemble the EEG pattern observed in wakefulness during a successful performance in episodic memory tasks (Addante et al 2011;Guderian et al 2009;Klimesch 1996Klimesch , 1999Klimesch et al 1996). Moreover, neuroimaging studies provided some support in favor of this perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Actually, it should be mentioned that the most studies on dreaming in older subjects were carried out by using retrospective questionnaire that are affected by some memory biases. It should also be considered that the cognitive-mnestic impairment might affect the DR process upon awakening (Giambra et al 1996;Schredl 2009). Finally, individual factors like a reduced interest in dream (Strunz 1993) should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%