Abstract:Young age at school entry (ASE) is related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in higher grades. The reason for this association is unclear, but medical oversupply and stress-related factors are discussed. We aimed to investigate whether ASE is associated with reported symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADH) already in first grade. Data of a population-based prospective cohort study (N = 2003; Mainz-Bingen region; Rhineland-Palatinate; Germany) with baseline assessments prior to school entry … Show more
“…In this hypothesis, ADHD is conceptualized as an individual deficit, but the RAE is blamed on an inadequate match between individual characteristics of the students and that of the school environment. This stress-related hypothesis was confirmed by the study of Diefenbach et al [ 34 ]: RAE was associated with ADHD-related behaviors at the end of the first grade but not at the beginning of the school year. However, this effect does not seem to endure over time because studies have shown that the RAE in ADHD is less common in adolescence and even disappears in adulthood [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We tested another hypothesis ( H4 ), which suggested that teachers were more likely to identify children having the double burden of being young in class and exhibiting ADHD behaviors because of their greater struggle in school. This hypothesis emphasized the importance of functional impairment as the main reason to seek medical care [ 17 , 34 ]. However, it could not be confirmed by our models, which were limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second hypothesis suggests that “entering school at a young age triggers ADHD” due to the younger-in-class students generally struggling to meet the demands of the classroom [ 6 , 34 ]. In this hypothesis, ADHD is conceptualized as an individual deficit, but the RAE is blamed on an inadequate match between individual characteristics of the students and that of the school environment.…”
Diagnosis and pharmacological treatment of ADHD are more common among the youngest children in a classroom, born in the months immediately preceding the school entry cutoff date. The mechanisms behind this phenomenon, called the relative age effect (RAE), are not yet well understood. Nearly all hypotheses involve the school system, various teachers’ actions, and concern children’s immaturity. However, most previous studies have been based on reports of health professionals’ diagnoses and prescriptions found in official databases rather than on reports of teachers’ behavior identification or suspicion of ADHD, despite their being at the first stages of the medicalization process. Our study overcomes this limitation by using reports of parents’ and teachers’ behavior identification or suspicion of ADHD within a three-level multilevel survey design, comprising 1294 children, 130 teachers, and 17 elementary public schools. The goal of our study was to investigate whether RAE stems (1) from adults’ judgement of the child’s expression of immaturity or (2) from the consequences associated with the child’s double burden of being immature and exhibiting ADHD behaviors. Our multilevel analyses put forward the first hypothesis only, supporting the medicalization of immaturity. RAE in ADHD seems mostly initiated by teachers’ pre-diagnostic actions toward younger children.
“…In this hypothesis, ADHD is conceptualized as an individual deficit, but the RAE is blamed on an inadequate match between individual characteristics of the students and that of the school environment. This stress-related hypothesis was confirmed by the study of Diefenbach et al [ 34 ]: RAE was associated with ADHD-related behaviors at the end of the first grade but not at the beginning of the school year. However, this effect does not seem to endure over time because studies have shown that the RAE in ADHD is less common in adolescence and even disappears in adulthood [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We tested another hypothesis ( H4 ), which suggested that teachers were more likely to identify children having the double burden of being young in class and exhibiting ADHD behaviors because of their greater struggle in school. This hypothesis emphasized the importance of functional impairment as the main reason to seek medical care [ 17 , 34 ]. However, it could not be confirmed by our models, which were limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second hypothesis suggests that “entering school at a young age triggers ADHD” due to the younger-in-class students generally struggling to meet the demands of the classroom [ 6 , 34 ]. In this hypothesis, ADHD is conceptualized as an individual deficit, but the RAE is blamed on an inadequate match between individual characteristics of the students and that of the school environment.…”
Diagnosis and pharmacological treatment of ADHD are more common among the youngest children in a classroom, born in the months immediately preceding the school entry cutoff date. The mechanisms behind this phenomenon, called the relative age effect (RAE), are not yet well understood. Nearly all hypotheses involve the school system, various teachers’ actions, and concern children’s immaturity. However, most previous studies have been based on reports of health professionals’ diagnoses and prescriptions found in official databases rather than on reports of teachers’ behavior identification or suspicion of ADHD, despite their being at the first stages of the medicalization process. Our study overcomes this limitation by using reports of parents’ and teachers’ behavior identification or suspicion of ADHD within a three-level multilevel survey design, comprising 1294 children, 130 teachers, and 17 elementary public schools. The goal of our study was to investigate whether RAE stems (1) from adults’ judgement of the child’s expression of immaturity or (2) from the consequences associated with the child’s double burden of being immature and exhibiting ADHD behaviors. Our multilevel analyses put forward the first hypothesis only, supporting the medicalization of immaturity. RAE in ADHD seems mostly initiated by teachers’ pre-diagnostic actions toward younger children.
“…Twenty‐two studies investigated the association between relative age and behaviour using questionnaires to assess internalizing and externalizing behaviours. The necessary information to obtain effect sizes was only available for ten studies (Broughton et al, 2022; Diefenbach et al, 2021; Goodman et al, 2003; Lien et al, 2005; Lincove & Painter, 2006; Price et al, 2017; Reijneveld et al, 2006; Wendt et al, 2018; Wienen et al, 2018; Wisniewski et al, 1995). These studies were included in a random effect meta‐analysis.…”
BackgroundWithin the same school class, it is usual to find children who differ in age by almost a full calendar year. Although associations between being relatively young and poor academic outcomes are well documented, and relatively consistent, the associations between being relatively young and psychosocial outcomes are less clearly documented.AimsTo review research which presents data relating to associations between a child's relative age and their psychosocial development.MethodsA systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.ResultsFifty‐nine papers met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes of the narrative synthesis and three meta‐analyses found consistent, but very small, associations with relative age indicating that those who are relatively young are more likely to have more negative behaviour, mental well‐being, and social experiences.ConclusionsAlthough being relatively young is associated with more negative psychosocial outcomes, the magnitude of these associations is consistently small. Furthermore, many of the outcome measures used are likely to be the result of multiple influences, not limited to the effects of relative age. Therefore, the findings are reassuring as they suggest that relative age itself is unlikely to substantially increase an individual's risk of poor psychosocial development.
Youngest students in their class, with birthdates just before the school entry cut-off date, are overrepresented among children receiving an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis or medication for this. This is known as the relative age effect. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the evidence on the influence of relative age on ADHD symptoms, diagnosis and medication prescribing. As no review to date has investigated the association with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis, this is also examined. Following prospective registration with PROSPERO, we conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched seven databases: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection, ERIC, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, and Cochrane Library. Additional references were identified from manual search of retrieved reviews. We performed a meta-analysis of quantitative data. Thirty-two studies were included, thirty-one investigated ADHD and two ASD. Younger relative age was associated with ADHD diagnosis and medication, with relative risks of 1.38 (1.36–1.52 95% CI) and 1.28 (1.21–1.36 95% CI) respectively. However, risk estimates exhibited high heterogeneity. A relative age effect was observed for teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms but not for parent ratings. With regard to ASD, the youngest children in their school year were more likely to be diagnosed with ASD. This review confirms a relative age effect for ADHD diagnosis and prescribed ADHD medication and suggests that differences in teacher and parent ratings might contribute to this. Further research is needed on the possible association with ASD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.