2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and uplift rates of Sirius Group sediments in the Dominion Range, Antarctica, from surface exposure dating and geomorphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At issue, however, is the proposed age of the wet-based deposits in the Beardmore region. Interbedded marine microfossils suggest a Pliocene age (Webb et al, 1996), whereas cosmogenic nuclide ages of boulders offset by faults that crosscut cold-based moraines stratigraphically younger than the wet-based Meyer Desert Formation indicate a pre-Pliocene age of older than 5 Ma (Ackert and Kurz, 2004). The similarity in the transition from wet-to cold-based glacial deposits both in the western Olympus Range and in the Beardmore region strongly suggests a shared climatic forcing.…”
Section: Regional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At issue, however, is the proposed age of the wet-based deposits in the Beardmore region. Interbedded marine microfossils suggest a Pliocene age (Webb et al, 1996), whereas cosmogenic nuclide ages of boulders offset by faults that crosscut cold-based moraines stratigraphically younger than the wet-based Meyer Desert Formation indicate a pre-Pliocene age of older than 5 Ma (Ackert and Kurz, 2004). The similarity in the transition from wet-to cold-based glacial deposits both in the western Olympus Range and in the Beardmore region strongly suggests a shared climatic forcing.…”
Section: Regional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Surface exposure ages of Beardmore moraine boulders overlying the Meyer Desert Formation, and offset by faults, are between 1.9-5.8 Ma (Ackert and Kurz 2004). The estimate assumed no erosion and constant elevation leading the authors of the study to conclude that the Meyer Desert Formation had to be much older than c.3 Ma.…”
Section: Location and Stratigraphy Of The Meyer Desert Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the major findings are as follows: (1) near-surface deposits in the stable upland zone have not been reworked by wet active-layer cryoturbation for at least the last several million years (Putkonen et al 2008a;Morgan et al 2010a, b; see also Schiller et al 2009); (2) the topographical diffusivity in the stable upland zone is the lowest of any region measured on Earth (Putkonen et al 2012); (3) erosion rates for exposed bedrock (Schaefer et al 1999;Summerfield et al 1999;Ackert & Kurz 2004) and regolith (Morgan et al 2010a) are among the lowest on Earth , reaching approximately 5-20 cm Ma 21 in the stable upland zone (and c. 1-2 m Ma 21 in the coastal thaw zone); and (4) the oldest surfaces at high elevations in the stable upland zone are at least about 12 -14 Ma (Schaefer et al 1999(Schaefer et al , 2000Margerison et al 2005). …”
Section: Cosmogenic Nuclide Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%