2000
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and ‘type’ of domain specific entry qualifications as predictors of student nurses’ performance in biological, social and behavioural sciences in nursing assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…nurses), variable age is positively cor related with the results achieved during studies. 13,[32][33][34][39][40][41][42] Generally, in case of older students, significantly better results of learning are noted as opposed to students who began their studies under the age of 26, regard less of any additional qualifications on entry. 32,40 In the studies on the reasons of attrition at the nursing depart ment, it was the young age that was pointed to as a negative predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…nurses), variable age is positively cor related with the results achieved during studies. 13,[32][33][34][39][40][41][42] Generally, in case of older students, significantly better results of learning are noted as opposed to students who began their studies under the age of 26, regard less of any additional qualifications on entry. 32,40 In the studies on the reasons of attrition at the nursing depart ment, it was the young age that was pointed to as a negative predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,[32][33][34][39][40][41][42] Generally, in case of older students, significantly better results of learning are noted as opposed to students who began their studies under the age of 26, regard less of any additional qualifications on entry. 32,40 In the studies on the reasons of attrition at the nursing depart ment, it was the young age that was pointed to as a negative predictor. 13,34,42 As is reported by Pryjmachuk et al, 13 age on entry is of moderate influence when it comes to timely completion of studies at the nursing department.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research often focuses on sound as just one aspect of multimedia learning, building on Paivio's dual coding theory and the tripartite memory model. There is a presumption that multimedia modality is superior; audio-only modality no longer receives wide scrutiny (Crooks et al, 2012;Koroghlanian & Klein, 2004;Mayer & Moreno, 2002;Mayer & Sims, 1994;Moreno & Mayer, 1999, 2000Mousavi et al, 1995;Tabbers, Martens, & van Merrienboer, 2001. Likewise, given a choice between audio-only and multimedia objects, nursing students may select media-rich items, rather than audio-only format materials, also assuming that its value for their education will be enhanced (Pilarski, Johnstone, Pettepher, & Osheroff, 2008;Shantikumar, 2011).…”
Section: History Theories and Characteristics Of The Modality Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, these college-age nurses had stopped studying science midway through their teenage years. Ofori (2000), in a study of over 200 British nursing students, notes that there are additional methods that allow entry for these students, such as the UK National Vocational Qualifications, which allow prospective nurses without GCSEs to qualify through work experience. He argues that age, rather than qualifications such as the GCSE, better predicts performance, with students under 20 more at risk, and students over 34 years of age predicting better performance.…”
Section: Characteristics Of First Year and Continuing Nursing Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSSQ and SEEQ have been used to measure students' satisfaction in six and nine categories respectively (see Table 1). Other categories and sub categories included students' characteristics: entry qualifications (Ofori, 2000); gender (Tatro, 1995); disability status (Scullion, 2000); ethnicity (Chevannes, 2001) and age (El Ansari & Oskorochi, 2006). Also included are the course characteristics study mode (Lee et al, 1999); course level (Kerridge & Matthews, 1998); course module and the qualification aim (Eaton et al, 2000;El Ansari, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%