2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.607107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age- and Sex-Specific Standard Scores for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test

Abstract: The reliable, valid and economic assessment of social cognition is more relevant than ever in the field of clinical psychology. Theory of Mind is one of the most important socio-cognitive abilities but standardized assessment instruments for adults are rare. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is well-established and captures the ability to identify mental states from gaze. Here, we computed standard scores for the German version of the RMET derived from a large, community-dwelling sample of healthy a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The link in performance between these tasks is absent in females. In addition, we did not find overperformance of females on the RMET-M [in contrast to other studies conducted with the standard RMET ( Baron-Cohen et al, 2001a , 2015 ; Schiffer et al, 2013 ; Baron-Cohen, 2017 ; Megías-Robles et al, 2020 ; Kynast et al, 2021 ), including our own findings ( Isernia et al, 2020 )]. This discrepancy most likely can be explained by modifications to the standard version (see Methods section), in contrast to which the RMET-M does not heavily rely on language capabilities and is balanced in relation to the visual input.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The link in performance between these tasks is absent in females. In addition, we did not find overperformance of females on the RMET-M [in contrast to other studies conducted with the standard RMET ( Baron-Cohen et al, 2001a , 2015 ; Schiffer et al, 2013 ; Baron-Cohen, 2017 ; Megías-Robles et al, 2020 ; Kynast et al, 2021 ), including our own findings ( Isernia et al, 2020 )]. This discrepancy most likely can be explained by modifications to the standard version (see Methods section), in contrast to which the RMET-M does not heavily rely on language capabilities and is balanced in relation to the visual input.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The RMET-M was administered for addressing the issue of whether face reading and body language reading are connected to other social cognitive abilities such as reading in the static eyes. Based on earlier reports with the standard RMET (e.g., Kirkland et al, 2013 ; Baron-Cohen et al, 2015 ; Dodell-Feder et al, 2020 ; Kynast et al, 2021 ; for recent review, see Pavlova and Sokolov, 2022b ) including the recent work of our own group ( Isernia et al, 2020 ), we anticipated females to be more proficient on the RMET-M. Contrary to our expectations, however, accuracy of females and males was comparable (0.77 ± 0.10 for females, and 0.75 ± 0.09 for males; t (47) = 0.19, p = 0.288, one-tailed).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a more rapid progression of social cognition impairments and cognitive decline is expected in at risk subjects specific attention has to be given these cohorts. To identify impairments as early as possible, standardized diagnostic tools for social cognition shall be developed and applied in clinical routine with high priority—a neglected cognitive domain so far although included in diagnostic criteria for neurodegenerative diseases already (American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ; Kynast et al, 2021 ). Tests shall be adapted for the use in older persons (Kynast and Schroeter, 2018 ).…”
Section: Consequences Of Face Masking In the Long Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…highly educated, young adults/undergraduates). Based on meta-analytic evidence [ 4 ] and our own studies [ 2 , 17 ], we expected a small on-average performance advantage in women relative to men. In line with this, RMET performance has been reported to be sensitive to hormone effects, including testosterone and estrogen [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%