2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age- and sex-specific normal values for shock index in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2008 for ages 8 years and older

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows slightly better diagnostic values of ASI than actual SI. [6] Unlikely, no such significant differences were observed in the present study. SI has failed to show prognostic information among trauma victims in India, and variation among predictive values may not be beneficial.…”
contrasting
confidence: 89%
“…This shows slightly better diagnostic values of ASI than actual SI. [6] Unlikely, no such significant differences were observed in the present study. SI has failed to show prognostic information among trauma victims in India, and variation among predictive values may not be beneficial.…”
contrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Data were abstracted on donor demographics, hemodynamic parameters, use of vasopressors, cause of brain death, as well as whether the donor was felt to be a suitable candidate for cardiac donation (either procured or planned procurement that was not carried out due to the lack of a suitable recipient). Hemodynamic parameters were age adapted, as reported elsewhere 8 . In addition, echocardiography data was collected, including serial echocardiograms as available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age and sex also were entered into the model as potential confounding factors. 24,25 Third, using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with interaction terms, pooled analyses were conducted to determine whether SI was an independent risk factor of the other predictor variables in all study patients (Table 3). Fourth, generalized additive models were used to calculate the mean survival times (MSTs) for the given SI values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%