1958
DOI: 10.1037/h0041825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and sex influences on MMPI profile peak distributions on an abnormal population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively young age of the head-trauma patients compared to other neurological groups may be important. MMPI Pd elevations are more frequently seen in younger than in older samples (39), and the current Pd elevation may be due to an interaction of age and sex variables with the stress of a major trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relatively young age of the head-trauma patients compared to other neurological groups may be important. MMPI Pd elevations are more frequently seen in younger than in older samples (39), and the current Pd elevation may be due to an interaction of age and sex variables with the stress of a major trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Early in the history of MMPI research, age was mentioned as an important factor deserving of more attention (Aaronson, 1958;Applezweig, 1953;Brozek, 1955;Calden & Hokason, 1959;Levy, Southcombe, Cranor, & Freeman, 1952). In the past decade, differences between the MMPI profiles of adults and adolescents have been examined thoroughly (e.g., Green, 1980;Marks, Seeman, & Haller, 1974;Watson, Harris, Johnson, & LaBeck, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 8 ) The MMPI scales were developed in the Midwest and have been accepted as a measurement of personality dimensions relevant to that area; they are less accepted as a reflection of personality patterns purported to be more typical of other regions of the U. S. Black ( 2 ) and Goodstein ( 5 ) investigated profile characteristics of college students in various regions of the U. S. No reliable differences were found, although the profiles were determined to be characteristic of college students as a group. Similarly, Smith(8) examined the RlMPI profiles of prisoners in various state institutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%