2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-004-0105-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and growth of the blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus, in the western North Atlantic Ocean with comments on regional variation in growth rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(26 reference statements)
6
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative methods to determine mortality and susceptibility, particularly those that incorporate fecundity (Smith et al 1998), are therefore required to determine whether the above assumption is correct. Last, as the biology of L. macrorhinus from Hervey Bay differed from that in other locations, it is recommended that further studies be conducted on this species, because regional variations in life history are likely (Driggers et al 2004a;Piercy et al 2007). Therefore, research on a local scale should be encouraged and populations of L. macrorhinus should be managed with a cautionary approach in the absence of regionally specific life-history data and quantitative mortality assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative methods to determine mortality and susceptibility, particularly those that incorporate fecundity (Smith et al 1998), are therefore required to determine whether the above assumption is correct. Last, as the biology of L. macrorhinus from Hervey Bay differed from that in other locations, it is recommended that further studies be conducted on this species, because regional variations in life history are likely (Driggers et al 2004a;Piercy et al 2007). Therefore, research on a local scale should be encouraged and populations of L. macrorhinus should be managed with a cautionary approach in the absence of regionally specific life-history data and quantitative mortality assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual sharks of each species were categorized into life stages based on published lengths at maturity (Clark & von Schmidt 1965, Castro 1993, Henningsen 2000, Driggers et al 2004, umbilical scar condition, and the degree of clasper calcification: young of the year (YOY; umbilical scar open or healed, but still visible), juvenile (healed umbilical scar; males with soft, uncalcified claspers and rhipidion not extensible, females based on length), and adult (males with hardened, calcified claspers, rhipidion extensible, females based on length). Some juvenile sharks were further classified as early juveniles by their small size and often faint presence of a healed umbilical scar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TL (Parsons 2006). Age and growth was studied for the blacknose shark in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico (Carlson et al 1999;Driggers et al 2004). Males mature at about 100-110 cm (39.4-43.3 in.…”
Section: Blacknose Sharkmentioning
confidence: 99%