1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00004952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and growth estimates of the bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas, from the northern Gulf of Mexico

Abstract: SynopsisLength at age and growth rates for 59 bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, collected from the northern Gulf of Mexico were estimated from the band patterns formed seasonally in the vertebral centra. The combined age at length data for both sexes were applied to a von Bertalanffy growth model producing paramfter estimates OfL, = 285 cm TL, K = .076, t, = -3.0 yr. Lengths at age for males and females were similar except that males did not attain as great a length as females. Growth was apparently slow and v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
115
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We regarded the change of angle caused by differences in growth rate from intra-uterine to post-natal life history stages as the point of birth, or birth mark and recorded it as year zero (Cailliet & Goldman 2004). Annual growth band deposition has been confirmed for bull sharks (Branstetter & Stiles 1987, Neer et al 2005) and pig-eye sharks (Tillett et al 2011a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We regarded the change of angle caused by differences in growth rate from intra-uterine to post-natal life history stages as the point of birth, or birth mark and recorded it as year zero (Cailliet & Goldman 2004). Annual growth band deposition has been confirmed for bull sharks (Branstetter & Stiles 1987, Neer et al 2005) and pig-eye sharks (Tillett et al 2011a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We regarded the change of angle caused by differences in growth rate from intra-uterine to post-natal life history stages as the point of birth, or birth mark and recorded it as year zero (Cailliet & Goldman 2004). Annual growth band deposition has been confirmed for bull sharks (Branstetter & Stiles 1987, Neer et al 2005) and pig-eye sharks (Tillett et al 2011a).Preliminary study. Initial analyses determined (1) the concentric manner in which the calcareous vertebral matrix was deposited and the corresponding 3-dimensional structure of the sagittal section, and (2) inter-vertebral variation in chemical composition of the matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Because size at birth is quite variable in bull sharks (Neer et al 2005) and growth rate among individuals is also variable, especially for smaller animals (Branstetter & Stiles 1987), it is possible that individuals that fall between 60 and 80 cm total length (in Fig. 4) may represent sharks whose isotopic compositions are both completely dependent and increasingly or completely independent of maternal composition (see Olin et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, temporal and spatial variability in shark diet may also be affecting our ability to fully resolve the early-life feeding ecology of bull sharks. Our data encompassed individuals collected in both wet and dry seasons over multiple years, but was not large enough to adequately address changes in shark diet on spatial and temporal scales.Because size at birth is quite variable in bull sharks (Neer et al 2005) and growth rate among individuals is also variable, especially for smaller animals (Branstetter & Stiles 1987), it is possible that individuals that fall between 60 and 80 cm total length (in Fig. 4) may represent sharks whose isotopic compositions are both completely dependent and increasingly or completely independent of maternal composition (see Olin et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bull sharks encountered in the SRMR are predominantly large animals with the majority being around 2.8 m (Brunnschweiler & Baensch, 2011). This mean length corresponds to an estimated weight of 200 kg (Branstetter & Stiles, 1987). They spend the majority of their time below 20 m in water with an average temperature of 27°C (Brunnschweiler, Queiroz & Sims, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%