A nalysis of myocardial deformation, or strain imaging, is becoming part of routine echocardiography. 1 The most widely accepted parameter to date has been global longitudinal strain as a measure of global left ventricular (LV) function. Global longitudinal strain (LS) of the LV, in (negative) percent, is the average of the maximal shortening (in percent) in the apicobasal direction of each of 18 LV segments visualized in the 3 standard apical views. The strain curves are computed using speckle tracking to determine myocardial velocity in a region of interest from which local strain is derived. LS is defined as deformation (shortening or lengthening) along the midline of LV walls, that is, in an apico-basal direction, but following the curvature of the LV walls.2 Similarly, global left or right atrial or right ventricular LS can be obtained as average of segmental peak LS. Strain data are highly dependent on image quality and frame rate, as well as physiological parameters as blood pressure.
See Article by Addetia et alThe article of Addetia et al 3 in this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging explores LS values from all 4 chambers obtained simultaneously from the 4-chamber view of the same cardiac cycle using a software (Epsilon Imaging, Ann Arbor MI) that can accommodate data acquired with echo machines from different echo manufacturers, although for this article, only echos acquired with one brand of echo machines were used. LS analysis was based on speckle tracking in 21 segments per patient (6 for the LV, 3 for the right ventricle, and 6 each for left and right atrium, using the same 3 septal segments for both); for each chamber, a global strain curve was calculated by averaging the segmental LS of the pertinent segments. Less than 1% of segments were excluded because of bad quality, which is a remarkably high success rate. For unclear reasons, the size of individual segments presented in Figure 1 of Addetia et al is somewhat variable, most conspicuously for the small basal right ventricular free wall segment. Global peak LS and heart rate-corrected time-topeak LS were measured for each chamber, and data from 259 healthy individuals, stratified by sex and age, are presented.Peak LV LS values, calculated from the 6 segments of the 4-chamber view, were −18±2%. This is lower than a recent meta-regression from the published literature reported for classic global LS (calculated from the 18 segments of the 3 apical views), namely −19.7%; 95% confidence interval, −20.4% to −18.9%. 4 Although the reduction compared with published values may seem low, 1.7% absolute percent difference corresponds to 9% relative change. Because strain measurements are typically used to detect small, subtle, subclinical changes, this is not a negligible difference.Peak left atrial strain values reported in the study of Addetia (+38±13%) are close to the published values. 5,6 For the right ventricular free wall, a normal range of −23±6% was found, again lower than currently recommended normal values from (−29±4.5%).1 Given the s...