2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and gender influence on foveal avascular zone in healthy eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we did not observe a significant difference in FAZ area between devices, it could be that we were underpowered to detect a small but significant difference. We can, however, say that if there is a significant difference between devices, it does not exceed 0.04 mm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although we did not observe a significant difference in FAZ area between devices, it could be that we were underpowered to detect a small but significant difference. We can, however, say that if there is a significant difference between devices, it does not exceed 0.04 mm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There were no significant differences in FAZ area (AngioPlex–AngioVue) between devices using either unscaled (paired t -test, average difference: 0.006 mm 2 , P = 0.069) or scaled measurements (paired t -test, average difference: -0.005 mm 2 , P = 0.11). Scaling resulted in decreased average FAZ area (mean ± SD) when using the AngioPlex (unscaled area: 0.281 ± 0.087 mm 2 ; unscaled range: 0.152–0.501 mm 2 ; scaled area: 0.271 ± 0.083 mm 2 ; scaled range: 0.147–0.483 mm 2 ) but increased average FAZ area (mean ± SD) when using the AngioVue (unscaled area: 0.275 ± 0.086 mm 2 ; unscaled range: 0.152–0.496 mm 2 ; scaled area: 0.276 ± 0.085 mm 2 ; scaled range: 0.153 - 0.499 mm 2 ). ( C ) Bland-Altman plot showing interdevice agreement for unscaled average FAZ area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study also showed significant differences in the FAZs of both the SCP and DCP layers between the NDR group and controls (0.33 ± 0.07 mm 2 vs. 0.26 ± 0.07 mm 2 , 0.51 ± 0.13 mm 2 vs. 0.38 ± 0.12 mm 2 , respectively; all p = 0.002). FAZs can vary between individuals, and so direct comparison may be difficult [ 21 , 22 ]. However, alterations of FAZs may be an important marker to identify early-stage DR, which might be one of the earliest signs of diabetic damage to retinal vasculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies have reported that the FAZ area size varies significantly among healthy eyes and that it is influenced by age, gender, axial length, spherical equivalent, retinal vascular density, central macular thickness and choroidal thickness (6) (7) (8) (9). Besides, several ischemic pathologies such as diabetic retinopathy and retinal venous occlusion modify its characteristics (10) (11). Glaucoma with central visual field defects has also been reported to cause an enlarged FAZ area (12) (13) (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%