2010
DOI: 10.1159/000311935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and Gender Differences in Hip Extension and Flexion Torque Steadiness

Abstract: Background: Lower extremity torque steadiness has been shown to be an independent predictor of functional performance in older women. Hip muscle function is crucial for many types of activities of daily living, yet existing studies investigating torque steadiness for lower extremities are limited to assessing steadiness at the knee and ankle. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare age and gender differences in hip extension (HE) and flexion (HF) strength, torque steadiness, and torque accuracy (TA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, hip extensors strength is important to accelerate the body up and forward [23]. Thus, according to previous study [24], age-related impair-Hip extension PT (Nm.kg ) -1 Fig. 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Also, hip extensors strength is important to accelerate the body up and forward [23]. Thus, according to previous study [24], age-related impair-Hip extension PT (Nm.kg ) -1 Fig. 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this study we have also looked into the question of torque consistency (steadiness), an issue which has been examined with regards to various lower extremity muscles [28,29]. The interest in this issue reflects the notion that lesser torque steadiness on repeated efforts could adversely affect maintenance of balance and functional performance such as gait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of gait, deviation from efficient movement is measured (Verschueren et al, 2002;Williamson and Marshall, 2009;Grunte et al, 2010), and in diabetic studies, treatments that constrain blood glucose levels to the optimum, or measure blood glucose, may be compared. Thus, for example, Daskalaki et al (2012) compare three methods of predicting blood glucose levels, and Lteif et al (1999) compare the accuracy of two methods of administering insulin doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is compared for old and new treatments, using presumably a t-test, although the type of test done is usually not specified. Thus, Aslanides et al (2011), Grunte et al (2010, Randleman et al (2007), Verschueren et al (2002), Wachler et al (2009), Williamson et al (2009), Walters et al (2006, and Lteif and Schwenk (1999) all compare the MAE of two groups, while Piso et al (2002) compared RMSEs and proportions in a specified range, and Daskalaki et al (2012) also compared RMSEs. The RMSE is defined as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%