2022
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age‐ and disease‐specific reference values for neurofilament light presented in an online interactive support interface

Abstract: Interpretation of axonal damage biomarker Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) concentrations is difficult due to the lack of age‐specific and disease‐specific reference values. We here developed an interactive interface to support interpretation of NfL results in human body fluids. We used NfL values of 1698 individuals without a neurological disorder, aged 19–85 years, and patients with MS and dementias. Percentile regression estimates per diagnosis populate interactive graphs, alongside NfL background informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application allows input of an individual’s age and plasma NfL level (generated using technology/assays similar to those used for the reference cohort), providing estimated centiles and z-scores and allowing visualisation on the centiles reference chart, compared to the large reference cohort, Control Group 2. This builds on other similar applications that have been developed recently (Benkert et al, 2022; Vermunt et al, 2022), but to our knowledge this is the first application to use GAMLSS modelling and providing both individualised percentiles and z-scores for plasma NfL. This application could be used for academic and research interests and will be used in studies underway to investigate the clinical and diagnostic utility and validity of such tools, as well as feasibility and utility for clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application allows input of an individual’s age and plasma NfL level (generated using technology/assays similar to those used for the reference cohort), providing estimated centiles and z-scores and allowing visualisation on the centiles reference chart, compared to the large reference cohort, Control Group 2. This builds on other similar applications that have been developed recently (Benkert et al, 2022; Vermunt et al, 2022), but to our knowledge this is the first application to use GAMLSS modelling and providing both individualised percentiles and z-scores for plasma NfL. This application could be used for academic and research interests and will be used in studies underway to investigate the clinical and diagnostic utility and validity of such tools, as well as feasibility and utility for clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, levels of NfL in CSF differed between the proband and her mother. The latter showed a significative increase in NfL levels, consistent with FTD-related pathology and then supportive of a bvFTD clinical diagnosis, while the proband presented only a moderate rise, which does not suggest underlying pathology of the FTD spectrum, although NfL age-specific and disease-specific reference values have not been established yet [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sNfL may be a useful biomarker across several aspects of MS care, to date, sNfL has largely been investigated on a group level and only a handful of studies have looked at predictions on an individual level. Interpretations of individual sNfL levels are also complicated by several common factors that associate with higher sNfL levels, including age, body mass index, impaired renal function, diabetes mellitus, and active smoking, underscoring the need for normative sNfL data to correct for these factors [84,87,94]. Prospective clinical use of sNfL on an individual MS patient level has not yet been established.…”
Section: Neurofilament Light Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%