Senescence could be defined as the gradual deterioration of functional characteristics in living organisms. The word senescence can refer to either cellular senescence or to senescence of the whole organism. Kidney senescence has been well described at the cellular and microscopic levels, with a distinction between the microstructural changes observed in normal physiologic aging versus in diseases (1,2). The effect of kidney senescence on GFR has been relatively well described but mainly from cross-sectional data, which are not ideal from a methodologic point of view (1,(3)(4)(5). After a period of kidney maturation in the first years of life, GFR remains constant until around 40 years. From the fourth decade, GFR is declining in line with the loss of nephrons (1). However, several important questions are still open. Is this decline observed in everyone? Is this physiologic decrease in GFR the same in men and women? Is this decline in GFR linear? Also, the evolution of GFR at the extremes of life is, by nature, difficult to study. Recently, Smeets et al.(6) assembled cross-sectional data from the literature to describe the evolution of GFR during the first 5 days after birth. On the other side of the age curve, data on GFR evolution in the elderly are scarce. Ideally, GFR slopes should be studied with longitudinal data using the measured GFR (exogenous clearance methods), but this is very challenging.In this issue of CJASN, Schaeffner et al. ( 7) studied the course of GFR with age in a longitudinal study of 2069 community-dwelling older persons (mean age of 8067 years old; the Berlin Initiative Study [BIS]) with eGFR and a follow-up time of 6.1 years. Study participants were members of the largest German statutory health insurance living in Berlin. The response rate in the BIS cohort has been reported to be relatively low (8%), but the loss to follow-up and the number of missing data were low in this study. The goal of the authors was double: "describe the crude and adjusted age-related course of eGFR in a population of individuals aged $70" and "define reference values for both sexes" (7). In our opinion, the population studied does not allow the authors to really "define" reference values. Indeed, although large and population based, their population may not be representative of the global German population over 70 years (and the authors never claimed such representativeness). Also, their population is obviously not a healthy one (e.g.,