2016
DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1226934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agamben’s political messianism in ‘The Time That Remains’

Abstract: The aim of this article is to shed light on the political ambitions of Agamben's book The Time That Remains. First, the article examines Agamben's political messianism in The Time That Remains by taking into account the question of political theology. Second, the article elaborates on a number of important concepts and ideas that are at the forefront of Agamben's political messianism. Third, the author elucidates the general framework within which one has to view Agamben's political messianism. In the fourth a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This brings forth the issue of how the “affirmation” of potentiality takes place or, put differently, how potentiality is actualized. Most responses to this issue implicitly affirm the passive interpretation to focus on Agamben’s notion of messianism (Cimino, 2016; Durantaye, 2009; Mills, 2004; Newman, 2017; Zartaloudis, 2015), which is also linked to the specifics of his ontology, insofar as actuality is held to be constituted by “gaps” that permit new potential configurations to simply arise (Attell, 2009; Sawczyński, 2018). The problem with these approaches is that although they enlighten our understanding of Agamben’s notion of the coming politics, they seem to make the change an effect of anonymous, pre-personal changes (Frazer and Hutchins, 2011: 139).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brings forth the issue of how the “affirmation” of potentiality takes place or, put differently, how potentiality is actualized. Most responses to this issue implicitly affirm the passive interpretation to focus on Agamben’s notion of messianism (Cimino, 2016; Durantaye, 2009; Mills, 2004; Newman, 2017; Zartaloudis, 2015), which is also linked to the specifics of his ontology, insofar as actuality is held to be constituted by “gaps” that permit new potential configurations to simply arise (Attell, 2009; Sawczyński, 2018). The problem with these approaches is that although they enlighten our understanding of Agamben’s notion of the coming politics, they seem to make the change an effect of anonymous, pre-personal changes (Frazer and Hutchins, 2011: 139).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%