2023
DOI: 10.1177/00048674231161504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against the use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 2–15 years

Abstract: Objective: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a widely used screening tool for emotional and behavioural problems in children. Recent quantitative analyses have raised concerns regarding its structural validity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. This paper aims to extend upon existing findings by analysing the factor structure of both the parent- and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in this population across a broader age range than in previous studies. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other strengths of the study include co-design of the CRQ-P/C with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in urban, regional and remote areas of South Australia, and study governance provided by members of the study’s Aboriginal Governance Group and Aboriginal authors (KG, CL, AN, GG) of this paper. While the CRQ-P/C was designed for use with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, the utility of the SDQ for this population has been questioned in terms of cultural sensitivity/content and psychometric properties [ 40 ]. Use of the total difficulties score may ameliorate some of these concerns (internal consistency reliability for the SDQ remains high across numerous studies), as does the comparable findings with the high MHC score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other strengths of the study include co-design of the CRQ-P/C with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in urban, regional and remote areas of South Australia, and study governance provided by members of the study’s Aboriginal Governance Group and Aboriginal authors (KG, CL, AN, GG) of this paper. While the CRQ-P/C was designed for use with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, the utility of the SDQ for this population has been questioned in terms of cultural sensitivity/content and psychometric properties [ 40 ]. Use of the total difficulties score may ameliorate some of these concerns (internal consistency reliability for the SDQ remains high across numerous studies), as does the comparable findings with the high MHC score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering recent recommendations that the SDQ should not be used to evaluate social and emotional well-being among Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children due to cultural bias (Chau et al, 2023;Santiago, Manzini Macedo, et al, 2021), the current study included only SDQ responses regarding Non-Aboriginal Australian children. For the purposes of the current study, we used the data from the B and K Cohort including: (1) Wave 2K (n= 4,309) in which children were aged on average 6.3 years old (range=5-7);…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Failing to consider the holistic nature of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander well-being has led to the development and application of inappropriate instruments. 43,44 In alignment with decolonial aspirations, instruments developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander re-search must capture integral constructs in a meaningful way, which includes instruments that differ in design and presentation than those commonly applied in colonial re-search settings, such as pictorial or activity based measures that require engaged participation. Finally, universalism, posits that certain constructs are 'common' to human life but their expression can be distinct across cultures.…”
Section: Data Capturing Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%