2017
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.2796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against Medical Advice Discharges

Abstract: The "Things We Do for No Reason" (TWDFNR) series reviews practices which have become common parts of hospital care but which may provide little value to our patients. Practices reviewed in the TWDFNR series do not represent "black and white" conclusions or clinical practice standards, but are meant as a starting place for research and active discussions among hospitalists and patients. We invite you to be part of that discussion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are consistent with global literature which have associated leave events with the profile of a young male patient of low socioeconomic status and medical comorbidities related to substance use disorder and mental health disease [2,[31][32][33][34]. Unfortunately, research focused on describing the characteristics of patients who leave against medical advice has served to perpetuate the notion that leave events are a deviant behaviour observed in individuals with certain characteristics [35] which can result in patient stigmatisation, and reduced access to care [35,36]. This deflects the attention from the quality gaps on the health care delivery models that disproportionally impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people [35,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These are consistent with global literature which have associated leave events with the profile of a young male patient of low socioeconomic status and medical comorbidities related to substance use disorder and mental health disease [2,[31][32][33][34]. Unfortunately, research focused on describing the characteristics of patients who leave against medical advice has served to perpetuate the notion that leave events are a deviant behaviour observed in individuals with certain characteristics [35] which can result in patient stigmatisation, and reduced access to care [35,36]. This deflects the attention from the quality gaps on the health care delivery models that disproportionally impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people [35,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The concept of shared decision-making may help reduce the prevalence of DAMA and protect the pediatricians to a certain extent from ethical dilemmas arising from DAMA (20,21). Shared decision-making involves physicians and patients making healthcare decisions together by combining the patients' values and preferences for care with the physicians' expertise and knowledge of medical evidence (22). Pediatricians and health care providers involved in children's care may need to promote this concept in child care practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, liability protection is conferred because of proper execution of discharge process and documentation of informed declination of care, as opposed to specific designation as ‘against medical advice’ 8. In fact, some advocate now that designating a discharge as against medical advice is paternalistic, signifies low value care, stigmatises patients and is a move away from patient-centred shared decision-making 25. We also propose replacing DAMA with a more neutral description of the event as a ‘premature discharge’.…”
Section: Shared Patient–system Responsibility Model To Generate Systementioning
confidence: 99%