2009
DOI: 10.1002/csr.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against corporate responsibility: critical reflections on thinking, practice, content and consequences

Abstract: This article critically refl ects on today's dominant articulation of corporate responsibility (CR) in terms of thinking, practice, content and consequences. We examine what has and has not changed since a seminal critique of the notion of business social responsibility put forward by Theodore Levitt 50 years ago. We illustrate our argument with the case of Botnia in Uruguay, which has recently generated much discussion in international media, and other examples that are illuminating on the problematic nature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
43
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Developed nations see philanthropic responsibility as compulsory via the legal settings but it is an expected norm for developing countries (Visser, 2008). At the same time, CSR activities seemed to be very important especially for MNCs as they have greater visibility and commonly face high media exposure with greater involvement of the community (Fougère & Solitander, 2009;Sotorrío & Sánchez, 2010). Schmidheiny (2006) has also strengthened that social issues are always given high media publicity in developing countries.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) and Its Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed nations see philanthropic responsibility as compulsory via the legal settings but it is an expected norm for developing countries (Visser, 2008). At the same time, CSR activities seemed to be very important especially for MNCs as they have greater visibility and commonly face high media exposure with greater involvement of the community (Fougère & Solitander, 2009;Sotorrío & Sánchez, 2010). Schmidheiny (2006) has also strengthened that social issues are always given high media publicity in developing countries.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) and Its Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Hanlon and Fleming (2009, p. 937) argued that there is a strong neo-liberal tendency in the ongoing discourse and claimed that corporate responsibility ''is one of a suite of practices that corporations are deploying as they seek to shift the nature of social regulation away from collective to more individual solutions''. Fougère and Solitander (2009) broadly agreed with this critique, yet were unsure whether harmful responsibility discourses are merely deliberate deceptions, or also represent a false consciousness in corporations.…”
Section: The Societal Level and The Critical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Levitt 1958;Banerjee 2007;Shamir 2008;Fougère and Solitander 2009;Hanlon and Fleming 2009) are asked what corporate responsibility is, their answers differ significantly from those of the advocates of the economic perspective. Within this stream of thought, scepticism that firms act, and even can act, responsibly is rife (Banerjee 2007;Kallio 2007).…”
Section: The Critical Perspective On Corporate Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication is conceptualised as a corporate conduit (Axley 1984) and results in a paradigmatic 'talk' versus 'action' distinction. It is a paradigm that deconstructionist CSR research (e.g., Aras & Crowther 2009;Fougère & Solitander 2009;Slack 2012) actually shares with the functionalist business discourse on CSR (e.g., Basil & Erlandson 2008;Preuss 2015;Waddock & Googins 2011;Wagner, Lutz & Weitz 2009;Yoon, Gürhan-Canli & Schwarz 2006). However, such a theoretical positioning expects the impossible of empirical research, requiring the identification of practices beyond communication (Boje, Gardner & Smith 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%