The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Post-Conflict Memorialization 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-54887-2_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afterword: Mourning, Memorialising, and Absence in the Covid-19 Era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because monuments and memorials shape space in the present (in the senses of the immediate public space these memorials inhabit as well as the broader space of the nation) as exclusionary and segregating (Miron, 2017), these objects can have the effect of depoliticizing cultural memory through the spatial fixing of historical narratives. Indeed, in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, which has been unfolding while this introduction has been written, there are emerging debates about memorialization of and during the pandemic (Otele et al, 2021; for a historical consideration of memorialization of pandemics, see Honigsbaum, 2018). Geographically diverse critiques and questions are emerging from these debates, such as how any official memorialization (or, indeed, absence of such) might reinforce racial and class dynamics in the U.S. context (Kim, 2020; Park, 2020; Savage, 2020) or how the failure to memorialize in the Indian context is intrinsically connected to hierarchies of grievability and the avoidance of accountability (Kurian, 2021).…”
Section: Sites Of Conscience: Putting Memory Into Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because monuments and memorials shape space in the present (in the senses of the immediate public space these memorials inhabit as well as the broader space of the nation) as exclusionary and segregating (Miron, 2017), these objects can have the effect of depoliticizing cultural memory through the spatial fixing of historical narratives. Indeed, in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, which has been unfolding while this introduction has been written, there are emerging debates about memorialization of and during the pandemic (Otele et al, 2021; for a historical consideration of memorialization of pandemics, see Honigsbaum, 2018). Geographically diverse critiques and questions are emerging from these debates, such as how any official memorialization (or, indeed, absence of such) might reinforce racial and class dynamics in the U.S. context (Kim, 2020; Park, 2020; Savage, 2020) or how the failure to memorialize in the Indian context is intrinsically connected to hierarchies of grievability and the avoidance of accountability (Kurian, 2021).…”
Section: Sites Of Conscience: Putting Memory Into Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%