2015
DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1018070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afterword: Come on out, you're surrounded: The betweens of infrastructure

Abstract: City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People are not merely resilient, they do not simply get evicted and then cope, shout, organise, attend, fight back; but they are, by and large, part of a wider socio-technical machine populated by agencies and affective capacities that co-governs them and ‘their’ actions. Such a claim is in-line with the conspicuous literature on urban assemblages (Block and Farias, 2016; McFarlane and Anderson, 2011), socio-technical infrastructure (Amin, 2014; Larkin, 2013; Simone, 2015a), and vitalist ontologies (Bennett, 2010; Braidotti, 2013), which blur the boundaries between the self and the ‘outer’ world. As Amin and Thrift contend, humans are only ‘dividuals’ ‘who for most of the time are simply part of a combination of bodies or parts of bodies, resonating around a particular matter of concern’ (Amin and Thrift, 2013: 50).…”
Section: Towards An Affective Understanding Of Eviction and Resistancesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…People are not merely resilient, they do not simply get evicted and then cope, shout, organise, attend, fight back; but they are, by and large, part of a wider socio-technical machine populated by agencies and affective capacities that co-governs them and ‘their’ actions. Such a claim is in-line with the conspicuous literature on urban assemblages (Block and Farias, 2016; McFarlane and Anderson, 2011), socio-technical infrastructure (Amin, 2014; Larkin, 2013; Simone, 2015a), and vitalist ontologies (Bennett, 2010; Braidotti, 2013), which blur the boundaries between the self and the ‘outer’ world. As Amin and Thrift contend, humans are only ‘dividuals’ ‘who for most of the time are simply part of a combination of bodies or parts of bodies, resonating around a particular matter of concern’ (Amin and Thrift, 2013: 50).…”
Section: Towards An Affective Understanding Of Eviction and Resistancesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…New infrastructures bring about new forms of governance, knowledge and subjectivity when introduced into the social realm. As Simone suggests,…”
Section: Seeing Infrastructure Through Suburbs and Suburbs Through Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I suggest that turning to feminist STS approaches can offer new perspectives that help us comprehend how and why we craft particular associations in research. I engage in a methodological process that considers situated knowledge to contend that infrastructures can represent shared and in‐between elements of urban lives (Simone, ). This process can reveal how such in‐between elements can provide opportunities for people to create new possibilities (Easterling, ).…”
Section: A Methodology For Experimenting With Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%