1996
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00179-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aftershock sequence of the 9 May 1989 Canary Islands earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a; Le Bas et al 2005). These additional observations, along with the seismically corroborated acoustic event location away from previously known seismic sources, suggests that future volcanic activity in the northern island chain may occur, though other origins are possible, such as edifice instability (Day et al 1999), hydrothermal activity (Jiménez & Garciá‐Fernández 1996), or plate flexure due to edifice loading (ten Brink & Brocher 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…5a; Le Bas et al 2005). These additional observations, along with the seismically corroborated acoustic event location away from previously known seismic sources, suggests that future volcanic activity in the northern island chain may occur, though other origins are possible, such as edifice instability (Day et al 1999), hydrothermal activity (Jiménez & Garciá‐Fernández 1996), or plate flexure due to edifice loading (ten Brink & Brocher 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the Canary Islands only a fault located between Gran Canaria and Tenerife Islands (Figure 1), with a NE-SW direction, has been identified [27] as being able to generate big earthquakes. This fault, first inferred from seismic and gravity data by [27], was identified as the source of the 9 May 1989 [27][28][29], the largest earthquake (mbLg 5.2) recorded in the Canary Islands during the instrumental period. Mantovani et al [30] proposed the existence of the Morocco microplate whose southern boundary coincides with the location of this left-lateral strike-slip fault.…”
Section: Geodynamic Settingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Overall, the level of historically recorded seismic activity is low in the Canary Islands region and mostly concentrated on the island of Tenerife and between the two main islands, Tenerife and Gran Canaria (Mezcua et al 1992, Jiménez andFernández 1996). The remaining historical records (Monge 1980) relate to: a few isolated deep earthquakes, with small magnitude, slightly felt over the whole area, outside the eruptive periods; seismic swarms with some strong shallow shocks (up to felt intensity VIII on the MMI scale), associated with eruptions in a number of cases - Tenerife 1909, La Palma 1949, 1971, but not in others -Fuerteventura 1915, La Palma 1936, 1939.…”
Section: Historical Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This proximity, complexities in the age sequence of volcanism in the islands, explained in terms of a plume by Carracedo et al (1998), and the lack of a clear geophysical plume signature led to the suggestion (Anguita and Hernán 1975) that the Canaries were formed by movement of melts up a propagating fracture system extending west from the Atlas; and that the Canaries were therefore a plate margin volcanism associated with active re- gional-scale deformation. This and similar models (Araña and Ortiz 1991) have been used to interpret a major earthquake in 1989 between the islands of Tenerife and Gran Canaria (Mezcua et al 1992, Jiménez andFernández 1996) as being of regional tectonic origin. Teleseismic records for the African plate sector of the Atlantic Ocean as a whole led Wysession et al (1995) to conclude that the seismic activity in this sector is concentrated around the Canaries and Cape Verde islands (Fig.…”
Section: Introduction -The Canaries Hot Spot and Active Deformationmentioning
confidence: 98%