“…If anything, it is as varied as the number of theoretical perspectives on postmodernism available -which are constellational, historically specific, and often incongruent with one another, to replicate Andreas Huyssen's argument (1986, p. 10). As a result, the postmodern gothic has been discussed -often under multiple aliases -in terms of critical disturbances of categories of analysis, narrative style, and hyperreality (BOTTING, 1996, p. 168-176), the spreading of the gothic through new media and its disruption of genre boundaries (ALLUÉ, 1999), the decline of faith in paternal metaphors or authoritative grand narratives (BOTTING, 2002), the dynamics of popular culture's appropriation of the canon (NASH, 2004), a counter-discourse to the Enlightenment (TRUFFIN, 2009), and a quintessential correspondence between postmodernism and the gothic (BEVILLE, 2009; PUNTER; BYRON, 2007, p. 50-53;SMITH, A. L., 1996). As far as parody, as well as other forms of textual appropriation, are concerned, studies have proven likely to communicate an understanding of parody as character performativity (HELYER, 2006), as a refashioning of gothic tropes (SMITH, A., 2013, p. 141-142), as a pastiche of the gothic style, in particular of the eighteenth-century gothic (TRUFFIN, 2009, p. 76), as an update (SPOONER, 2006, p 74) or else an upgrade (STAMENKOVIC, 2016, p. 400) to the genre, or as a form of mockery, free play or bricolage that denotes the umpteen ways the gothic has leaked from literature into other venues of cultural production, which is usually taken to denote a decline of the former powers of the genre (BOTTING, 2008, p. 12).…”