2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After the Splits: Information Flow between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the size of the rolling window is determined to quantify the subsequence bundles consisting of đť‘ş binary numbers. Each subsequence bundle is converted from a binary sequence to a new decimal number, đť‘ż đť‘ş [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Then, the entropy of the random variable đť‘ż đť‘ş is derived as…”
Section: Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the size of the rolling window is determined to quantify the subsequence bundles consisting of đť‘ş binary numbers. Each subsequence bundle is converted from a binary sequence to a new decimal number, đť‘ż đť‘ş [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Then, the entropy of the random variable đť‘ż đť‘ş is derived as…”
Section: Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches investigate information flow between different assets: the Granger causality test [14,15], information shares [16], and common factor weights [17]. We used transfer entropy [18], which is free from restrictions on model structure [12,15,19], and calculated the histogram-based transfer entropy defined on equally spaced bins [15], where appropriate bin width h was determined using Freedman-Diaconis' rule [20,21]. Effective transfer entropy was further considered to correct the bias from the finite sample size.…”
Section: Transfer Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature reveals that the process of how potential developers perceive OSS projects is one of the main determinants of developer engagement in many developer participation models (Alyahya & Alamer, 2019;Bosu et al, 2019;Reboucas et al, 2017;Xu et al, 2009). The open nature of Blockchain allows a developer an inclusive decision-right to contribute to the projects that directly influence the decision processes of implementing new ideas (Islam et al, 2019;Lindman, 2021;Yi et al, 2021). A Blockchain developer refers to an individual who voluntarily contributes to Blockchain projects.…”
Section: Personal Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a distributed autonomous community context, the lack of centralized formal authority makes it impossible to balance the interests of all developers (Dirose & Mansouri, 2018;Islam et al, 2019;Yi et al, 2021). The coordination issue often leads to the desertion or abandonment of necessary governance mechanisms by a more significant number of developers (Arrunada & Garicano, 2018;Pelt et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%