After the Reform: Change in Dutch Public and Private Organizations

Morales, Fernando Nieto; Wittek, Rafael; Heyse, Liesbet

doi:10.1093/jopart/mus006

Cited by 17 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One empirical example of sector convergence is Poole et al (2006), who study organizational behavior differences between the public and private sectors during a 20-year period and find convergence to some extent. A similar picture is found in a more recent study by Morales, Wittek, and Heyse (2013) on Dutch organizations. They argue that public and private organizations are becoming more similar in relation to organizational aspects.…”

Section: Theorysupporting

confidence: 89%

The Increased Importance of Sector Switching: A Study of Trends Over a 27-Year Period

Frederiksen

Hansen

2014

Administration & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sector switching is new to the public administration literature, and our knowledge about its prevalence and trends is limited. Yet sector switching is an important phenomenon that casts light on public-private differences. We study sector switching in a modern economy, using unique Danish register-based employer-employee data covering more than 25 years. We find that sector switching constitutes 18.5 percent of all job-to-job mobility, and the trend is increasing both from public to private and from private to public. We also find an increase of sector switching for middle managers in both directions, while we only find an increase for administrative professionals from private to public and for top managers from public to private.

show abstract

Section: Theorysupporting

confidence: 89%

The Increased Importance of Sector Switching: A Study of Trends Over a 27-Year Period

Frederiksen

Hansen

2014

Administration & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Morales et al . () found evidence of modest convergence in Dutch public and private sectors, but substantial distinctness remained. There is also evidence that the private sector is making an effort to pay more attention to self‐regulation and the common good, especially related to environmental concerns (e.g.…”

Section: Evolution Of the Perennial Debatesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Administrative Leadership Theory: A Reassessment After 10 Years

Wart

2013

Public Administration

189

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A variety of assessments through 2001 discussed the striking neglect of theory related to leadership in public sector organizational settings. For example, Jerry Gabris, Bob Golembiewski, and Doug Ihrke called on the field to ‘improve on the emaciated condition of public leadership theory’. My assessment of administrative leadership soon thereafter, while trying to emphasize a recent uptick in volume, was nonetheless that ‘the needs are great and the research opportunities are manifold’. My relatively negative assessment has been widely cited and needs to be re‐evaluated a decade later since much progress has been made and the research needs have evolved substantially.

show abstract

“…The high levels of managerial autonomy and exposure to regulatory pressures arose from an increased impact in a change in public organizations, but not in private organizations. Rather, the results support the idea that NPM reform made public organizations more like private organizations (Cuervo, Ribeiro, & Roig, 2007;Nieto Morales et al, 2013;Schmidthuber & Wiener, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Secinaro¹,

Corvo²,

Brescia³

et al. 2019

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to systematically review literature concerning hybrid structures, that is, structures that are used to implement various forms of management. More specifically, the authors aim to answer two questions: can the evolution of hybrid organizations be analyzed and mapped, and if so, what are the factors that govern their development? The document is based on a systematic review approach of Little et al. (2009), which aims to make the selection of literature and the review process transparent and replicable following steps, eliminating the problem of prejudice to ensure objectivity of the research and credibility in the results as demonstrated by Rosenthal (1979) and Cooper (2003). What emerges from the literature of hybrid organizations seen from the point of view of NPM, the concept of Paradox, PPPs and Hybrid Impact is very interesting because by tidying up the concepts that various scholars have found it is possible to define what have been the factors that influenced the evolution of hybrid organizations giving a historical definition and helping to understand the roots of the concept and specifically where these new entities will generate impact. Several documents have analyzed the contribution of these approaches to the improvement of Management, Decision-Making, Identity Work, Governance, Hybrid Laws, Microfinance Institutions MFIs and Corporatizing. Through this research the authors hope to contribute to the academic and professional community by summarizing the known literature and suggesting paths for further research precisely because it is necessary the cooperation.

show abstract

After the Reform: Change in Dutch Public and Private Organizations

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Cited by 17 publications

References 35 publications

The Increased Importance of Sector Switching: A Study of Trends Over a 27-Year Period

The Increased Importance of Sector Switching: A Study of Trends Over a 27-Year Period

Administrative Leadership Theory: A Reassessment After 10 Years

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About