2019
DOI: 10.1080/17567505.2019.1681647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After the Fire: Reconstruction following Destructive Fires in Historic Buildings

Abstract: teaching undergraduate and postgraduate architecture and building surveying students; with his main areas of expertise including fire safety, building conservation and building pathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the limit values of structures for fire resistance established in the current regulations in the field of construction of modern buildings are more stringent than the values of fire resistance limits at the time of construction of cultural heritage sites, as shown by Lisienkova et al (2021) [1]. Kincaid (2019) [14] showed that the discrepancy between modern requirements for building structures fire resistance and the actual values of the fire resistance limits of structures at cultural heritage sites causes great difficulties in the reconstruction of such facilities. [18] showed a particularly difficult case during reconstruction is the increase in the actual fire resistance limits of building structures made of materials that are rarely used in modern construction.…”
Section: Garcia-castillo Et Al (2023)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the limit values of structures for fire resistance established in the current regulations in the field of construction of modern buildings are more stringent than the values of fire resistance limits at the time of construction of cultural heritage sites, as shown by Lisienkova et al (2021) [1]. Kincaid (2019) [14] showed that the discrepancy between modern requirements for building structures fire resistance and the actual values of the fire resistance limits of structures at cultural heritage sites causes great difficulties in the reconstruction of such facilities. [18] showed a particularly difficult case during reconstruction is the increase in the actual fire resistance limits of building structures made of materials that are rarely used in modern construction.…”
Section: Garcia-castillo Et Al (2023)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Old or historic buildings are, in general, more vulnerable to fire (Torero, 2019;Raneri, 2021), which is why the most recent studies highlight the importance of investigating the vulnerability of each building, considering the context in which they are inserted and their unique needs, to understand how their structure influences the overall fire performance (Torero, 2019;Bakas et al, 2020;Salazar et al, 2021;Romão & Bertolin, 2022;Petrini et al, 2022 ). The bibliographic review identified some of the characteristics that make historic buildings vulnerable to fire, namely: the presence of numerous wooden structures; the absence of adequate compartmentalization; the impossibility of altering the original characteristics of the building; uncertainty regarding techniques and materials used in the original construction; the existence of voids and other elements with low fire resistance; insufficient number of alternative exits; long distances to travel, in the sense of evacuation; storage of flammable substances; non-compliance of electrical installations; difficulties in accessing emergency services and the absence of active fire detection and suppression systems (Naziris et al, 2016;Iringová & Idunk, 2017;Torero, 2019;Devi & Sharma, 2019;Kincaid, 2020;Quapp & Holschemacher, 2020;Caliendo et al, 2020;Castillo et al, 2021;Cao et al, 2021;Huang, 2022;Petrini et al, 2022). The old or historic buildings were built at a time when the principles of fire safety were not observed, presenting, for this reason, characteristics that make it challenging to apply a set of prescriptive requirements present in the current regulations.…”
Section: Main Considerations Of the Literature Review On Fire Safety ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fires at the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and the National Museum of Brazil exemplify the intangible value that can potentially be lost to fire and demonstrate the high level of community support for heritage structures, not to mention the €300–600 million 5 (US$330–670 million 6 ) and US$125 million 7 estimated costs for rebuilding the Notre Dame Cathedral and the National Museum of Brazil, respectively. The aforementioned fires were high‐profile events, but data collected by Historic England noted that in 2018 in England, over 350 fires occurred in heritage structures with 40 causing serious damage 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned fires were high-profile events, but data collected by Historic England noted that in 2018 in England, over 350 fires occurred in heritage structures with 40 causing serious damage. 8 There is limited guidance available in standards and codes on heritage timber in the fire. Comprehensive guidance on the overall protection of a heritage building is provided in the NFPA 914: Code for the Protection of Historic Structures, however, there is little information regarding material performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%