1981
DOI: 10.1177/107769908105800313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After Ginsberg and Tinker: Book Banning and Minors' First Amendment Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholarship in JMCQ warned as early as 1981 that, despite the strong, clear language of the landmark Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ruling in 1969 establishing First Amendment protections for expression by high school students, the courts were regularly allowing censorship that contradicted Tinker (Huffman & Trauth, 1981). Two decades later, scholarship showed censorship of student expression continued (Kopenhaver & Click, 2001), and three decades later, analysis documented how the courts by then had rendered Tinker so “toothless” that it offered scant protection for students’ freedom of speech (Kozlowski, 2011).…”
Section: Free Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarship in JMCQ warned as early as 1981 that, despite the strong, clear language of the landmark Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ruling in 1969 establishing First Amendment protections for expression by high school students, the courts were regularly allowing censorship that contradicted Tinker (Huffman & Trauth, 1981). Two decades later, scholarship showed censorship of student expression continued (Kopenhaver & Click, 2001), and three decades later, analysis documented how the courts by then had rendered Tinker so “toothless” that it offered scant protection for students’ freedom of speech (Kozlowski, 2011).…”
Section: Free Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%