2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After-hour trauma-radiograph interpretation in the emergency centre of a District Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that emergency nurse practitioners were at least as good as senior house officer (SHO)-level doctors at interpreting MIU skeletal radiographs [ 18 , 19 ]. There is evidence to suggest that junior doctors' accuracy in the interpretation of trauma radiographs is lower when compared to registrar or consultant counterparts [ 20 , 21 ]. Tachakra et al (2002) [ 22 ] were able to demonstrate that emergency medicine consultants were at least as good as consultant radiologists at interpreting minor injury unit skeletal radiographs by contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that emergency nurse practitioners were at least as good as senior house officer (SHO)-level doctors at interpreting MIU skeletal radiographs [ 18 , 19 ]. There is evidence to suggest that junior doctors' accuracy in the interpretation of trauma radiographs is lower when compared to registrar or consultant counterparts [ 20 , 21 ]. Tachakra et al (2002) [ 22 ] were able to demonstrate that emergency medicine consultants were at least as good as consultant radiologists at interpreting minor injury unit skeletal radiographs by contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in fractures likely corresponds to a similar increase in the number of radiologic examinations performed, which is the main modality used in fracture diagnostics. Only approximately 10% of radiographs [4] permit the detection of a fracture, which means that in order to detect the 178 million fractures, theoretically, radiographs from 1.78 billion examinations would need to be reviewed annually [5]. Reviewing and reporting this high volume of diagnostic images around the clock would create a situation with a high risk for diagnostic error [6], which ranges from 4% to around 30% depending on the study sample [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%