After Hegel

Quante, Michael; Leland, Patrick R.

doi:10.4324/9780203856581.ch7

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 2 On the splits in the Hegelian School (including a Hegelian Centre) in relation to a range of religious debates see Stewart (2011: 66−95). See also Quante (2010: 197−237) and Toews (1985: 141−99).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The same content in two different languages? Hegel's conception of religion and philosophy and its critique by D.F. Strauss

Mooren

2023

Hegel Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to contribute to debate on Hegel's conception of the relationship between religion and philosophy by proposing that it can be a read as a division of labour between Christian religion and speculative philosophy. This reading allows us to understand better Hegel's idea that religion and philosophy have the same content in two different forms. I distinguish between the institutional and the intrapersonal dimensions of Hegel's claim of a division of labour between religion and philosophy. I then turn to a critique of Hegel's philosophy of religion by showing how David Friedrich Strauss's concluding dissertation from The Life of Jesus, Critically Examined can call our attention to some internal tensions within Hegel's conception. Although Strauss's interpretation does not present an insurmountable objection against Hegel's conception of a division of labour, it can help to illuminate to what extent Hegel oversimplified the practical implications that his conception might have for the priest's attempt to continue his instruction to the members of his community.

show abstract

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%