After DSM-5

Lacasse, Jeffrey R.

doi:10.1177/1049731513510048

Cited by 21 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This framework embraces the assumptions that "psychiatry is a branch of medicine and treats people who are sick, there is a boundary between the normal and the sick, there are discrete mental illnesses, psychiatrists should concentrate on biological aspects of mental illnesses, and diagnostic criteria should be codified" (Jacobs and Cohen, 2012, p. 88). The publication of the manual's fifth edition (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) immediately provoked an unprecedented-both in size and intensity-criticism from within and outside psychiatry (e.g., Kirk et al, 2013;Timimi, 2013;Wakefield, 2013;Gambrill, 2014;Lacasse, 2014).…”

Section: Quasi-scientific Basis Of Adhd In Dsm-5mentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychiatrization of Society

2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

Section: Quasi-scientific Basis Of Adhd In Dsm-5mentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychiatrization of Society

2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is not especially surprising. By seeing human suffering as a function of broken brains, the DSM often overlooks the complex and mutually determining interplay of psychological, sociocultural, contextual, and biological factors (Frances, 2013; Gambrill, 2014; Lacasse, 2014; Paris, 2015). While the DSM does not completely ignore psychosocial factors, it typically treats them as extraneous variables that influence, but are distinct from, the presumed primary cause of emotional suffering: a dysfunction inside the individual (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).…”

Section: How About An Alternative To the Dsm Suitable For Psychotheramentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DSM has been widely criticized for questionable science (Jones, 2012; Kamens, Elkins, & Robbins, 2017; Khoury, Langer, & Pagnini, 2014; Kirk & Kutchins, 1992; Lacasse, 2014; Obiols, 2012). RDoC expresses commitment to science, but currently relies more on conceptual speculation about hypothetical “domains” than it does on clear and convincing data (Kirmayer & Crafa, 2014; Peterson, 2015).…”

Section: Requirements Of a Dsm Alternative Suitable For Psychotherapistsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Might an Alternative to the DSM Suitable for Psychotherapists Look Like?

Raskin

2018

Journal of Humanistic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent research suggests that psychologists and counselors are dissatisfied with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, and open to seeing the development of alternatives to it. Any alternative suitable for psychotherapists must meet certain requirements. A successful alternative must (a) place psychosocial factors on equal footing with biological factors; (b) categorize problems, not people; (c) be scientifically grounded; (d) be collaboratively developed; and (e) be usable across orientations, professions, and constituencies.

show abstract

“…However, the apparent simplistic grouping was further criticized (Fox, 1983) and, in fact, the classification of the disorders is still in the process of reformation (Laughren, 2011;Simpson, 2014). With the advent of DSM-5, the specifications were stringently made, yet an underlying gap remains to be (Lacasse, 2014;Nemeroff et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%