2020
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After an end‐of‐life decision: Parents' reflections on living with an end‐of‐life decision for their child

Abstract: Parents' role as end-of-life decision-makers for their child has become largely accepted Western healthcare practice. How parents subsequently view and live with the end-of-life decision they made has not been extensively examined.To help extend understanding of this phenomenon and contribute to care, as a part of a study on end-of-life decision-making, bereaved parents were asked about the aftermath of their decision-making. MethodsA qualitative methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question we asked the parents, namely their degree of approval of a decision already made by the medical team, reflects the preferential choice of our team that parents participate in the decision without being directly responsible for it, which appears as intermediate between a paternalistic approach and a shared decision [ 40 ]. In reality, however, some parents during the 3-month interview reported having been the main actors in the decision-making process, using the words “we were asked to decide.” A recent qualitative study underlined that most parents could “well live” with the decision they made for their child [ 44 ]. The results of our work also suggest that the parental perception of having explicitly agreed to the decision, or even of having been an actor in the decision, can change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question we asked the parents, namely their degree of approval of a decision already made by the medical team, reflects the preferential choice of our team that parents participate in the decision without being directly responsible for it, which appears as intermediate between a paternalistic approach and a shared decision [ 40 ]. In reality, however, some parents during the 3-month interview reported having been the main actors in the decision-making process, using the words “we were asked to decide.” A recent qualitative study underlined that most parents could “well live” with the decision they made for their child [ 44 ]. The results of our work also suggest that the parental perception of having explicitly agreed to the decision, or even of having been an actor in the decision, can change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Parental vulnerability," helplessness due to the inability to protect one's child from harm that propels the parent to "re-defining parenthood" (Nuss, 2014), was noted to be especially acute among participants. Importantly, the sense of control and parental self-efficacy described in parents caring for their children through terminal illness (Sullivan et al, 2020) were unavailable to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,49 Parents who thought they were coerced into decision-making felt anger, bitterness and distress and they described their experience as horrific and painful. 44,49,62,63 Difficulty grasping the reality. Parents struggled with the reality of the situation when they were making decisions.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,38,45,48,50,52,53,56,60 Parents firmly believe in their responsibility to make decisions which include choices related to treatment and life support. 39,45,49,56,58,62 There was also evidence of child involvement, either through verbal expression of their wishes or nonverbal signs that indicate their desire to continue living. 38,48,49,61,63 Parents saw themselves as experts on their children and, in situations in which they felt like they were not getting enough support from doctors, they had a strong need to protect the child.…”
Section: Table 3 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%