“…As Dekeyser and Jellis (Dekeyser & Jellis, 2021, p. 318) argue, much research in human geography still remains ‘affirmational’, ‘the inclination to embrace—ontologically, politically, and/or ethically—the productive forces of inciting, sustaining, and cultivating existence’ (see also Chandler & Pugh, 2022; Noys, 2010; Pugh, 2022). Yet, there is also today certainly a broader backlash against affirmational approaches, through the rise of such tropes as ‘worldlessness’ (Dekeyser, 2022), ‘world‐destructive theory’ (Colebrook, 2021) and ‘nothingness’ (Moten, 2016; Oliver & Dekeyser, 2022), the ‘nonrelational’ (Harrison, 2007; Rose et al, 2021), ‘Afropessimism’ (Culp, 2021; Wilderson III, 2020), the ‘abyssal’ (Chandler & Pugh, 2022; Pugh, 2022; Pugh & Chandler, 2023), the ‘ante‐ontological’ (Harney & Moten, 2013, 2021; Ife, 2021; Ruiz & Vourloumis, 2021) and ‘paraontological’ (Bey, 2020; Chandler, 2014; da Silva, 2022). In various ways, the unobtainable, that which cannot be reduced to the cuts and distinctions of ontological world‐making, or the ontic realm, is rising to the surface of debate as a focus for research.…”