Language in South Africa 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511486692.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afrikaans: considering origins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nienaber, 1994;van Rensburg, 2016) when a first permanent Dutch settlement was established in the Cape. The emergence and development of Afrikaans out of Dutch has been the object of much debate, with hypotheses ranging from postulations of a purely internal, if accelerated development of dislocated Dutch, to analyses in terms of deep creolisation and adstrate influence from Khoesan languages, South-African Malay, Bantu languages, and Portuguese Creole, and various positions in between (see Roberge, 2002; van Sluijs, 2013 for overviews). Our concern, though, is not the history of the observable linguistic features of Afrikaans, but the competing metadiscourses sanctioning it, or not, as a separate linguistic category and as a standard language fit for governance, written administration, and 'high culture'.…”
Section: South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nienaber, 1994;van Rensburg, 2016) when a first permanent Dutch settlement was established in the Cape. The emergence and development of Afrikaans out of Dutch has been the object of much debate, with hypotheses ranging from postulations of a purely internal, if accelerated development of dislocated Dutch, to analyses in terms of deep creolisation and adstrate influence from Khoesan languages, South-African Malay, Bantu languages, and Portuguese Creole, and various positions in between (see Roberge, 2002; van Sluijs, 2013 for overviews). Our concern, though, is not the history of the observable linguistic features of Afrikaans, but the competing metadiscourses sanctioning it, or not, as a separate linguistic category and as a standard language fit for governance, written administration, and 'high culture'.…”
Section: South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the diachronic development of Afrikaans, all of the four logically possible changes that have occurred are shown in Table 1: Table 1. Coda processes in the diachrony of Afrikaans (Conradie 2017;Donaldson 1993;Roberge 2002) Process…”
Section: Processes In Phonotactic Change: From Dutch To Afrikaansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis competes with two other scenarios that have been proposed with respect to the linguistic development of Afrikaans. According to the creolization view (for example, Valkhoff 1966; Den Besten 1989, 2009a; Roberge 2002, 2009), the grammatical and phonological developments of Afrikaans result from language contact between Dutch, other European languages, Cape Khoekhoe, and various slave languages. The other competing view is commonly referred to as the interlect scenario, whose two main supporters are Ponelis (1990) and Van Rensburg (1996).…”
Section: The Lenition and Deletion Processes And Their Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%