Africanisation of international investment law for sustainable development: challenges

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to critically examine the move to Africanise international investment law (IIL) aimed at promoting sustainable development on the continent. Design/methodology/approach The study analyses the move by African countries to “Africanise” IIL by incorporating specific and innovative provisions and features in their international investment agreements (IIAs) for the benefit of African economies. This is evidenced by provisions in African regional investment instruments such as the 2007 Common Market of Eastern and Southern Africa Investment Agreement and the 2008 Economic Community of West African States Supplementary Act on Investments produced by the different African regional economic communities (RECs), new-generation IIAs such as the 2016 Nigeria-Morocco IIA and the China-Tanzania IIA and the African Union’s Pan-African Investment Code 2016. The common features of these instruments include linking the objective of investment promotion and protection to sustainable development; excluding portfolio investments; including provisions on investor-obligations; and reserving wide scope of regulatory space for host-states, including the ability to take emergency measures without incurring liability to investors. Some of these provisions are rare in IIAs. Findings The study finds that, while the efforts are commendable, there are real challenges. Firstly, there are inconsistencies in the regimes existing on the continent due to differences in the contents of the international investment instruments promulgated by the different RECs, and also differences in the content of IIAs signed by some member-states of the RECs with countries external to the RECs. Secondly, there are governance gaps and a lack of enforcement in practice, which would undermine the effectiveness of the laws being forged. Thirdly, the Africanised IIL alone would not attract investment if other important determinants, such as critical infrastructure, remain lacking. Fourthly, there is under-representation of Africa in the arbitral institutions that develop and enrich the laws, which, if it continues, would undermine the effectiveness of the Africanisation provisions being included in IIAs. Research limitations/implications While the research discusses both law and policy, more is discussed of the law, owing to space limitation. Practical implications It is anticipated that this research will impact the content of the investment protocol under the African continental free trade area and beyond and will prompt review of existing and future IIAs by member states of the various RECs to align them for consistency. It is also hoped that this research will impact the review of various investment instruments of the RECs with the aim of harmonising them. It is further hoped that this research would contribute to addressing the challenges that militate against the achievement of the goals of Africanising ILL for sustainable development. Originality/value The study is original. It has not been published previously and the authors have found no existing publication that addresses the issues covered in this study.

What Place for Electric Vehicles as a Research Object and a Practical Alternative to Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles in Africa? Toward a Research Agenda Based on a Systematic Literature Review and a Census of Electromobility Projects

“…Additional supporting measures may include incentive-based regulatory schemes and national (or community) preference clauses ( 42 ). The latter option echoes the trend toward an “Africanization of the economy” ( 43 ), following in the footsteps of emerging economies of Asia such as China, which since 2005 has adopted an official policy to support “indigenous innovations” ( 44 ).…”

The human rights-based approach to sustainable development: Lessons from recent African investment treaty practice

“…The Africanization of IIL is also defined in terms of its primary characteristics or outcomes. Several characteristics of the Africanization of IIL have been identified including tying investment protection to SD objectives, establishing provisions on investor obligations, and preserving a wide range of regulatory options for host states, including the ability to take emergency measures without incurring investor liability [ 4 ]. Mbengue and Schacherer acknowledge that the “Africanization of IILs” has resulted in the reformulation of traditional investment treaty provisions and the introduction of direct investor obligations [ 3 ].…”

“…Several scholars have referred to the recent development in African investment treaty practice as the “Africanization of international investment law” [ [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] ]. The “Africanization of IIL” is described as a concept or process emphasizing the innovative initiative at the African level to progress from rule-takers to rule-makers in IIL [ 6 ].…”

Implications of sustainability initiatives on African Continental Free Trade adoption by firms under environmental uncertainty

“…The implementation of the AfCFTA will help to trigger the fundamental reforms needed for long-term growth in African countries. The new continental trade pact offers a unique opportunity for countries in the region to integrate competitively into the global economy, reduce poverty and promote inclusiveness (Laryea and Fabusuyi, 2021; Shibasaki et al , 2022). Africa has made significant progress in improving living standards and reducing poverty over the past decades, but increased trade can foster reforms that increase productivity and create jobs, thereby further reducing poverty.…”

“…In some cases, these reforms may require politically difficult decisions. It is very important to add that the objectives of the African AfCFTA are very much in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including the promotion of independent finance and development, decent work, prosperity and climate action, as well as the African Union’s Development Agenda 2063 (Hirsch, 2021; Laryea, and Fabusuyi, 2021; Shibasaki et al , 2022).…”